TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cerner HealtheIntent vs. InterSystems TrakCare

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Score4.5 out of 10
    N/ACerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.N/A

    InterSystems TrakCare

    Score1 out of 10
    N/AIntersystems offers TrakCare, an EMR system with additional modules to cover a wide range of functions of use in clinic administration.N/A
    Pricing
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Cerner HealtheIntent and InterSystems TrakCare
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    InterSystems TrakCare
    6.4
    1 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Patient billing00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Financial Reporting00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Cerner HealtheIntent and InterSystems TrakCare
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    InterSystems TrakCare
    3.1
    1 Ratings
    80% below category average
    Charting / document management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Templates00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Patient portal00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Fax integration00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Speech recognition00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Customization00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Cerner HealtheIntent and InterSystems TrakCare
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    InterSystems TrakCare
    5.5
    1 Ratings
    41% below category average
    HIPAA compliance00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Role-based permission levels00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Workflow and Scale
    Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Cerner HealtheIntent and InterSystems TrakCare
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    InterSystems TrakCare
    1.0
    1 Ratings
    153% below category average
    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    RXNT
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    Score9.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cerner HealtheIntentInterSystems TrakCare
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InterSystems
    Well suited if you have no developers and need something up quickly to let users get into patient data. But if you want to go beyond the layout, organization, or access of the application, it’s an uphill battle and doesn’t scale at all. If you want to be able to evolve the product, it’s not easy whatsoever
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InterSystems
    • Quickly get a front end working into patient indexes.
    • Integrates with InterSystems products.
    • Works with IE well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InterSystems
    • Extensibility of features.
    • Custom JavaScript/HTML/CSS support is almost nonexistent.
    • Source control has to rely on serialization of entire compiled package of TrakCare instead of individual edited files.
    • Transformations should handle everything instead of just non system default code.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    InterSystems
    InterSystems has great support, however TrakCare is a different experience and their knowledge of that product is far more limited. This is shown through the lack of documentation of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InterSystems
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InterSystems
    • Quick results for a new company.
    • Costing exponentially more to maintain as we evolve the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots