TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Censornet Email Security vs. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Censornet Email Security

    N/AN/AMulti-layered email security for the organisation from known, unknown and emerging email security threats. The solution helps to stop large-scale phishing, targeted attacks, CEO fraud and malware in their tracks with a cloud email security solution.N/A

    Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ACisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides protection against email threats that compromise an organization’s brand and operations. Its advanced threat detection capabilities uncover known, emerging and targeted threats. And it expands the scope of organizations' defenses to detect dangerous threats and rapidly search for and remediate threats across security controls. Secure Email Threat Defense's Artificial Intelligence and machine…N/A
    Pricing
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsThe Censornet Email Security is priced as a subscription model on a per user per year basis. Please contact Censornet for details.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Considered Both Products
    Censornet
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    27 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    27 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    27 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    23 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Secure Email Gateway
    Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Censornet Email Security and Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Feature
    Censornet Email Security
    -
    Ratings
    Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    8.4
    23 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Anti-malware00 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Customizability00 Ratings8.816 Ratings
    Data Loss Protection00 Ratings8.215 Ratings
    Threat Detection00 Ratings8.923 Ratings
    Sandboxing00 Ratings8.115 Ratings
    End-to-End Encryption00 Ratings8.816 Ratings
    Management Tools00 Ratings7.222 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Small Businesses
    Barracuda Email Protection
    Score10 out of 10
    Barracuda Email Protection
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Avanan
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Avanan
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Avanan
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Avanan
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Censornet Email SecurityCisco Secure Email Threat Defense
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I will certainly recommend Cisco Secure Email to my friends/colleagues, one look at the dashboard/statistics will actually convince any IT professional to use this product. We noticed an outstanding improvement in Email quality, most of the SPAM emails are caught, and our users have never been happier!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • Manages Junk Mail Well-We configured and tested our configuration to filter out the majority of junk mail hitting our inboxes.
    • Manages Graymail-We configured and tested our Cisco ETD for graymail filtering and reduced the amount of unwanted advertising and other legitimate emails.
    • Creating unique policies that were tailored to block or allow emails from certain senders.
    • Stopped malicious email traffic (e.g., malicious attachments and links) with rules for identifying and stripping potentially malicious attachments or links.
    • Allows easy configuration for other email security measures such as SPF, DMARC and DKIM.
    • Cisco engineers provide an annual free security health check. We took advantage of several security health checks where Cisco certified engineers go over the security setting of our Cisco ETD. We were provided a written report that highlighted strengths and weaknesses of our Cisco ETD setup.
    • Monitoring email traffic flow is almost overwhelming with the amount of information you can obtain from the portal. This gives valuable information to IT staff in terms of volume and type of emails the company is receiving.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • The web interface is definitely dated
    • The software updates to the user interface and the documentation online are not congruent. Some docs are old and information is lacking to make changes
    • The email filtering and email search features are really dated. And other tools are more user friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    There is a 50/50 chance that we will renew. We are in the middle of moving from on-prem to the cloud so we may not need it once we are fully migrated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Good interface, easy to use and set up. If there were any issues, there is very good documentation and videos that one can follow for additional setup and best practices. As typical with most Cisco solutions, there are more features than needed for our purposes but good to know they are there in case of future needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense's availability is great and reliable when you need it most. We haven't had any noticeable outages or issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Strong support with fast response. TAC can suggest best mail policy regarding customer challenges Some cases they need to do patch directly to appliance. TAC does not need to remote the appliance through our laptop. They use secure connection to appliance, check the logs and response through the problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    The implementation went well, no issues or problems to report.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Cisco SETD, with a broad deployment and full integration with Microsoft 365 gives us a strong protection, especially where we can leverage its strengths: Microsoft‑365 integration, mailbox remediation, policy enforcement, and your visibility across Cisco tools.


    Proofpoint is better around user awareness (warning tags etc.), and continuity/archiving. Considering that we have a full Cisco stack, choosing Proofpoint would come with higher cost, learning curve, possible redundancy of features, licensing complexity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Censornet
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • Our email security has increased.
    • Users are now more confident about their email security.
    • Management of threat detection and prevention has become easier.
    • Finer controls on spam filtering gives customization capability.
    • GDPR compliance ensures peace of mind from a regulation point of view.
    • The quarantine feature has ensured that we do not lose important emails while they are being analyzed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Screenshots

    Screenshot of an Impact Report showing efficacy metrics and ROI indicatorsScreenshot of a detailed view of phishing messagesScreenshot of the dashboard