censhare vs. Concrete CMS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
censhare | N/A | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | censhare’s Universal Content Management platform is an automated, centralized solution to manage all kinds of digital content. Fully integrated, it removes the need to work with multiple systems with different user interfaces, freeing teams to create innovative and powerful customer experiences. With censhare, content is no longer splintered across a variety of servers, workstations and cloud services. All data is held centrally and interlinked by relationships that can be searched quickly.… | $1,000 per month, 5 named users |
Concrete CMS | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Concrete CMS (formerly Concrete5) is a free and open source, PHP built content management system for content on the web and also for intranets. It is optimized to support the creation of online magazines and newspapers. | N/A |
| censhare | Concrete CMS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In general, pricing is based upon selected functionality and number of users. For SaaS deployments additional charges apply. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| censhare | Concrete CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 22 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 22 Answers | |
| censhare | Concrete CMS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Creation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| censhare | Concrete CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Umbraco CMS Score6.7 out of 10 | Umbraco CMS Score6.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Square Online Score7.4 out of 10 | Square Online Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | RWS Tridion Sites Score9 out of 10 | RWS Tridion Sites Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| censhare | Concrete CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.8 |
| censhare | Concrete CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | censhare Screenshots | Concrete CMS Screenshots |
















