TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Celoxis

    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A

    Wrike

    Score8.3 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.

    $240

    per year 2 users (minimum)

    Pricing
    CeloxisWrike
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike Free
    $0
    per month per user
    Wrike Team
    $10
    per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
    Wrike Business
    $25
    per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
    Wrike Enterprise
    Request a quote
    per month per user
    Pinnacle
    Request a quote
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CeloxisWrike
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CeloxisWrike
    Considered Both Products
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Wrike
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Would buy again
    669 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    462 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    683 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    319 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    370 Answers
    Features
    CeloxisWrike
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and Wrike
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Wrike
    8.0
    758 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Task Management9.34 Ratings9.0752 Ratings
    Resource Management7.74 Ratings8.3635 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.74 Ratings8.8531 Ratings
    Scheduling8.53 Ratings8.1657 Ratings
    Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings8.5643 Ratings
    Team Collaboration7.44 Ratings8.8751 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings7.3391 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology10.01 Ratings8.4348 Ratings
    Document Management8.02 Ratings7.3633 Ratings
    Email integration9.02 Ratings7.3569 Ratings
    Mobile Access6.01 Ratings8.1550 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking8.53 Ratings7.6345 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management9.02 Ratings7.723 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management8.03 Ratings7.4266 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and Wrike
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Wrike
    7.8
    264 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Quotes/estimates8.53 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Invoicing7.02 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting7.53 Ratings7.5260 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.01 Ratings8.3152 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CeloxisWrike
    Small Businesses
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft To Do
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Microsoft To Do
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CeloxisWrike
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    8.8
    (792 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (99 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (114 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (22 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (19 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (88 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (12 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (32 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (14 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.9
    (6 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CeloxisWrike
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Celoxis
    Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wrike
    Wrike is well-suited for content creation, review, and management. I can't speak to other types of work it can be suitable for because I use it as a writer only, but I would recommend it to other people in content creation fields who have to work with a team. A friend of mine is an editor at the local newspaper, and I think some features of Wrike would make her editing tasks a little easier and promote more cohesion in her team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Celoxis
    • Project planning
    • Time log
    • Efforts analysis vs plan
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wrike
    • different views to accommodate different users workflow
    • predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
    • Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Celoxis
    • Support is at times slow to respond.
    • Not new user-friendly.
    • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wrike
    • Templating.
    • For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
    • Importing.
    • Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
    • I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
    • Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    We had staff in person provide some training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Celoxis
    I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wrike
    We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    company purchase
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Wrike
    I do not use professional services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Celoxis
    • Positive in most cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wrike
    • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
    • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
    • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Celoxis Screenshots

    Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementProduct screenshot

    Wrike Screenshots

    Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows