Celigo vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Celigo
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Celigo is an iPaaS integration platform for companies to easily connect apps, sync data, and automate processes. Integration wizards, templates, and other tools help help business users integrate NetSuite to any application or data sources. Celigo is available in four editions, and aims to meet the integration needs of all companies -- whether it is to implement a single use case to company-wide adoption of the platform. According to the vendor, the unique flow-based pricing is aligned…N/A
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
Pricing
CeligoProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CeligoProcessMaker
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CeligoProcessMaker
Features
CeligoProcessMaker
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Celigo
8.6
Ratings
7% above category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Celigo
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Celigo
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.2
Ratings
25% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CeligoProcessMaker
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CeligoProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CeligoProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
Celigo is great for transaction-based integrations (which is most), but not great for when you want to replicate data from one system to a database. For example, if you are trying to get all of your NetSuite data into a Snowflake database. However, if you are trying to get data out of NetSuite and create transactions in another system, it's perfect.
Read full review
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Read full review
Pros
  • Error Management is better than anything you can build on your own
  • Celigo makes visibility of your data between platforms very nice
  • Broad Capabilities. Anything with an API can be connected.
Read full review
  • Connecting activities across applications which are not part of the core landscape (e.g. Excel, MS Teams)
  • Being able to identify activities being performed such as typing into a form, reading content on pages, or navigating between pages in an application.
  • Identify copy / paste events, including the source system / application being copied from and the target.
Read full review
Cons
  • EDI transactions are difficult to setup and use
  • FTP transactions can be slow when using them for a lot of volume
Read full review
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Read full review
Usability
There is a bit of a learning curve, but not bad. Once you get a flow or two under your belt, there will be no stopping you. You will start to see possibilities and ways to apply automation and integration throughout your business. It becomes fun to look for additional ways to save money, time, and improve accuracy
Read full review
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
Support Rating
Had some rough patches in the beginning, but they were resolved.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We demoed some of these other integration options. The learning curve seemed a bit steeper and the offerings less robust, so we did not pursue very far. I cannot speak to the others much. We have not had a reason to stray from Celigo.
Read full review
Based on our experience, the agent for ProcessMaker Task Mining is more robust than for either of the competing products. However Celonis is has a significantly more mature user interface, and UiPath has a significantly more configurable interface.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I gave this rating for the adaptability and growth for Processmaker for its many capabilities for support and flexibility. These include ease of integration with many other systems, its open source version for its extended customization and capabilities of the tool and its low-code / no-code capabilities to be able to easily design and automate processes with minimal or no-code.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Quickly Sync Sales Order from Shopify to NetSuite
  • Sync back order fulfillments from NetSuite to Shopify
  • Import order from Amazon Seller Central to NetSuite
  • Sync customer information from Shopfiy to Saleforce
Read full review
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Celigo Screenshots

Screenshot of Integrator.io: Where the applications to integrate are chosenScreenshot of Integrator.io: Establishes a Connection RecordScreenshot of Integrator.io: Integration Flow Builder