TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CB Permissions Replicator vs. OpenText Documentum

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CB Replicator

    Score2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    A major problem of storing Dynamics 365 documents in SharePoint is the missing synchronization of privileges and permissions. This allows unauthorized SharePoint users to access private documents and sensitive data even if they don’t have CRM privileges to do so. CB Replicator, is an out-of-the-box solution that is designed to remedy this issue by automatically synchronizing Dynamics CRM privileges with SharePoint permissions.

    $3,600

    per 100 users

    OpenText Documentum

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
    Pricing
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Editions & Modules
    CB Dynamics CRM to SharePoint Permission Replicator for 100 User
    $3,600
    per 100 users
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup Fee$80 per userOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of CB Permissions Replicator and OpenText Documentum
    Feature
    CB Permissions Replicator
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Small Businesses
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Esker
    Score10 out of 10
    Epicor ECM
    Score5.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tungsten Capture
    Score8 out of 10
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Score7.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CB ReplicatorOpenText Documentum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Connecting Software
    It is an ideal program for the portfolio of already consolidated clients, for large financial companies with a high professional profile. In the cases that I do not recommend it, it is for small and medium-sized financial companies, with a portfolio of clients in training, since the cost-benefit ratio is not attractive.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Connecting Software
    • Visually friendly for the end user, maintaining the most common design style for workers
    • The adaptation time and the learning curve is relatively shorter than other similar applications
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Connecting Software
    • The graphics could be developed in a better way, they should be more modern, friendly and show the information in more detail.
    • Develop a module in the application that allows personalization by the user, giving him the possibility to manage a tool made by him to suit him. Moves the APPS Mobile concept to the design of the program.
    • Although the tool is well integrated with Microsoft, you can think of a development of integration with social networks or mobile developments, both users, and customers.
    • Develop a more economical and simple version, aimed at small and medium enterprises, with small client portfolios
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Connecting Software
    It is a complementary tool of the main CRM, which provides an adequate management of the documentation, reports, files that are derived from the business activity. It offers adequate levels of security for small businesses, the implementation is easy compared to other tools, it is easy to use, it offers adequate file capacity. In the future it can be strengthened with access to the cloud, development of apps and integration with other platforms.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Connecting Software
    As it has already been said before, it is a simple implementation program, easy to use, with a short learning curve, with a friendly interface, a good design, a security according to the type of company and with the possibility of personalization. It provides an accessible cost tool to improve business management and document management.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Connecting Software
    Until now, technical support has not been required to a large extent, but for this question three variables must be taken into account; The level of complexity of the implementation of the tool, the courses, tutorials, training and learning curve of the users, and finally the technical support as such. This tool has implementation attributes and ease of use, reducing the incidence of technical support.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Connecting Software
    Check the seller's website, read the technical specifications of the product, calculate the investment in personnel, software and hardware, validate that the management modules document is what they are looking for. Project the integration of the program with the systems that the company manages. Read many reviews and note the most important points of the user experiences.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Connecting Software
    Basically, my main experience is focused on Dynamics, I have worked with similar tools developed in a particular way by the firms for which I have worked. They are monitoring tools developed by the system and planning area. For the internal use of the company. Obviously, this is a leading international program.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Connecting Software
    • Without speaking directly of figures, on the positive side of the implementation of the program is tied to the time of learning the tool. In practice, it is much easier to learn by professionals, making the implementation time short, as well as, minimizes the margin of error in the initial handling of the program.
    • As it is a tool for easy learning and with a reduction in the margin of error due to the learning curve, it allows working only with the technical support offered by the provider, without having the need to create an internal department of attention to the user, which lowers costs.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    CB Replicator Screenshots

    Screenshot of User MappingScreenshot of Starting and Stopping the ServiceScreenshot of Edit Configuration