Carbon Black App Control vs. Carbon Black EDR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbon Black App Control
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Carbon Black App Control is an application control product, used to lock down servers and critical systems, prevent unwanted changes and ensure continuous compliance with regulatory mandates.N/A
Carbon Black EDR
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Carbon Black EDR is an on-premise incident response and threat hunting solution designed for security operations center (SOC) teams with offline environments or on-premises requirements.N/A
Pricing
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Best Alternatives
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbon Black App ControlCarbon Black EDR
Likelihood to Recommend
It is more suited to lock down critical systems and servers to prevent unwanted changes, although you can use it on daily basis on laptops and desktops, it needs constant attention and events analysis. For some scenarios i.e. financial institutions it is a must-have solution, as App Control now is a requirement 5 of PCI DSS.
Read full review
Investigating suspicious behavior on an endpoint, ability to kill processes and run files on the host. Ability to view every change made on a system in a timeline format. Ability to search across the enterprise for indicators of compromise. Ability to pull files from the host for further analysis. Ability to safely communicate with an endpoint by isolating it from the rest of the network
Read full review
Pros
  • Device Control - you can view and allow/disallow the ability for certain devices to be used in your environment. Specifically we used this with USB drives. If you have one you want to use - whitelist the serial number. The rest can't be used. Simple and easy.
  • Software blocking. If you have an extremely dynamic software base (I doubt this is likely) this could get a bit annoying, but for most organizations like ours where we have specific applications that are required, and then the rest are a bit of an afterthought, it's easy to whitelist the correct applications that you want to be able to run in your environment. The rest can't run (in high enforcement). Users are able to easily request new applications, and you can set certain groups to be able to approve it on their own.
  • Solid platform - with few exceptions setting up new software was very easy (Dragon Medical was a bit tricky, but worked through it with support). Once you have your rules set up and the initial setup done, you tend not to have to do much of anything except to update on occasion and deal with a few requests for applications to be unblocked, or publishes approved.
Read full review
  • Process tree view of endpoint activity
  • Ability to pull files from host
  • Threat Intelligence integration
  • Isolate a host
Read full review
Cons
  • More frequently updates of "Software Updaters".
  • Possibilities to tag within Yara rules.
  • Overall it is the best whitelisting solution I have used.
Read full review
  • Number of false positive which are triggered due to threat feeds are sometimes more needs to be fine tuned by the client.
  • In very rare scenarios processes are not captured properly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The big difference between Protect and Barkly/AMP is how exactly it goes about what it's doing. Protect is application whitelisting and program reputation. So the way it's protecting you is using a proprietary reputation service, and hash values to identify applications, and then hitting a list of whitelisted programs to decide if you are able to run that or not, based on the policy you are in. There is a LOT of value in that. We actually are working on transitioning to Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP). The main reason is cost (about the same cost as Cb Protect, but with (most of) the featureset of all 3 Carbon Black products for less than 1/3 of the total spend. AMP works differently, looking at a reputation service powered by Cisco's Talos cloud. You don't really have application whitelisting, but that also reduces how many "requests" you get for applications. So I'll have to find a different way to do whitelisting and USB blocking and the like, but I'm getting more visibility across my network and also built in antivirus (TETRA engine - ClamAV with some work). Barkly is an add that we are looking to put in as it looks at behavior of programs. So specifically it watches for privilege elevation and the like. Thus far all the big name problem children (WannaCry, other ransomware problems) have been caught natively in Barkly day 0.
Read full review
It has better UI.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Dashboards are easy to understand for management
  • We feel more secure than we were on our previous platform
Read full review
  • It is helping to protect us from potential loss of revenue that would be caused by malware or a compromised account.
  • It took some time in deploying in the environment , but that time is much worth it because of the results we are getting now.
  • It helps in hunting, which help us check and protect our environment from any cyber attacks.
Read full review
ScreenShots