TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BWise

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/ABWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.N/A

    SAI360

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ASAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
    Pricing
    BWiseSAI360
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BWiseSAI360
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    BWiseSAI360
    Governance, Risk & Compliance
    Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of BWise and SAI360
    Feature
    BWise
    8.3
    2 Ratings
    10% above category average
    SAI360
    7.7
    3 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Common repository of GRC items8.72 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Risk management8.12 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems7.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    GRC policy management8.72 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Incident management9.02 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    User Ratings
    BWiseSAI360
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (2 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BWiseSAI360
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SAI Global
    Well suited for general compliance, multiple initiatives, and integration with TeamMate. SAP GRC Process control may be better suited for an SAP environment. Oracle GRC may be better suited for an Oracle environment. Overall, BWise is a very cost effective, and flexible solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SAI Global
    • Great reporting tool (uses SAP Business Objects). It is quite flexible on types of reports that can be created and supported. Also the reporting consultants are very competent and nice.
    • Highly customizable solution: almost everything can be tailored to an organization's needs, assessments, audits, issues, recommendations, tasks, etc. However, there's a trade-off between customization and the integration of different areas of the organization.
    • Increases visibility and efficiency in the organization. BWise offers centralized repositories (catalogs) that can be easily accessed and used by everyone in the organization (e.g. Process catalog, Policies and Procedures catalog, Risks, Controls, Laws catalogs, etc.). Also, the application allows findings on controls tested by Audit to be automatically reflected in controls monitored by SOX for example, without the need for SOX to retest them. So one area can leverage on the work of other areas increasing operational efficiency.
    • Increases integration and avoids silos. By choosing the correct design (e.g. Risk Workshops instead of Open Assessments), one area can see and benefit from another areas' work. An example was mentioned above; another would be Operational Risk area considering the results of Business Continuity, Vendor Management, Info Security, etc. assessments when carrying out theirs. Additionally, processes can be integrated: when contracting a new vendor for instance, one can include questions about data confidentiality and usage of models in the Vendor risk assessment. Answers to these could then trigger Info Sec / Model Risk assessments.
    • Increases accountability. Application provides full audit/change log with the type of change, name of executor, and date of change.
    • Easier follow-up. BWise sends automatic emails with reminders to the people required to take action on an issue, assessment, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    • Customized unified design platform
    • Modules that fit your organization
    • Low technology involvement with information department.
    • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
    • Single sign-on web-based applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SAI Global
    • Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
    • Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
    • Surveys.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    • Reporting
    • Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
    • Look and feel
    • Intuitive UI
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SAI Global
    BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SAI Global
    I found BWise to be very intuitive and user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    SAI Global
    BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    SAI Global
    The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    SAI Global
    Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be obtained. MetricStream was very modern looking with an intuitive UI. Appeared to have all the features with a number of additional bells and whistles. The price point was far above our budget and we could not get approval to move them to the RFP.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SAI Global
    • Increased employee efficiency especially considering incident management and follow up.
    • Increased visibility and senior management information/awareness.
    • Increased employee accountability.
    • Reduction of silos.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAI Global
    • The system is costly for the initial setup
    • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
    • One license for all users
    • Easy to manage employee's security access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots