Butternut vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Butternut
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Butternut allows the user to automate the interactions between SaaS applications while combining them with human actions, to stay in control while eliminating the busywork. As the loop operator, the user chooses the direction the workflow should take when things get too complex to be automated. Butternut boasts an intuitive interface that lets the user link services without writing a single line of code. It presents drag and drop operations to pull in data, send them to services,…
$1
per operation
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Editions & Modules
10k-70k operations
0,001
per operation
1k-10k operations
0,002
per operation
70k+ operations
0,0005
per operation
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ButternutRed Hat JBoss EAP
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOnly pay for what you use. Your first 1k operations each month are free Then starting at 0.002€ / operation.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Features
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Butternut
-
Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ButternutRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is well suited for deploying high transaction Java EE based applications. It supports many popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We run a high traffic B2B application on JBoss and it is very stable. Boot time when restarting services is also fast
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Fast response.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires less server resource
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Butternut Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of