Bugasura vs. Icinga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bugasura
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Bugsura is a bug-tracker for teams, built with the vision of having a standalone bug-tracker without any dependency of project-management that makes it discover and deliver for many bug-tracking needs as features. It is invented for simplicity and collaboration. Currently being used by all the members for SaaS teams. Be it a developer, a designer, manager, or even a marketing team member, Bugasura can be used to report and track issues and…N/A
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Pricing
BugasuraIcinga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugasuraIcinga
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugasuraIcinga
Best Alternatives
BugasuraIcinga
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugasuraIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugasuraIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bugasura Screenshots

Screenshot of Customize Everything:
From tracking to closure, every modern team has their own way of doing things. Customizing workflows becomes a pain. Not with Bugasura. Just anyone can set up a new flow and manage issues on it.Screenshot of Modern teams use collaboration and simple workflows to move things faster. 
Bugasura brings you everything you need to work together and release software.Screenshot of Close Bugs Faster: What matters to developers is what’s on their plate to close.
Bugasura enables them to focus on closing what’s assigned to them with a personalized view of bugs they need to resolve.Screenshot of Issue Threads: Every issue has its own story line. Many issue trackers fail at understanding this.
Bugasura gives each issue a detailed track, till it gets closed.Screenshot of Enable Quality and Track Coverage: QA Test Teams put in a lot of effort to find just one issue but who sees the effort.
Bugasura gives you a complete overview of device coverage, test coverage and even tester level coverage.Screenshot of Inclusive tool:A team has a diverse set of people. If a tool works for one - it doesn’t for others.
Bugasura is highly inclusive. It is built keeping Product, Design, QA and Dev teams in mind.