Bryntum vs. Progress Kendo UI
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bryntum | N/A | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Bryntum provides enterprise-grade JavaScript components and tools designed to streamline project management and resource scheduling for modern web applications. Its product suite enables development teams to implement Gantt charts, interactive schedulers, and Kanban boards. By integrating Bryntum’s UI components, organizations can manage dependencies, allocate resources more efficiently, and gain real-time visibility into project timelines, while reducing the overhead typically associated… | $850 one-time fee per seat |
Progress Kendo UI | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Kendo UI is a JavaScript UI toolkit that allows users to build responsive web-based apps integrated into their framework of choice (jQuery, Angular, React, or Vue). The vendor’s value proposition is that Kendo UI offers a large library of popular and configurable components ranging from sophisticated grids and charts to basic buttons, so users don’t have to waste development time building their UI. The vendor also says the large library of customizable themes means users can easily deploy a… | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Bryntum | Progress Kendo UI | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bryntum | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 35 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 33 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 35 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 34 Answers | |
| Bryntum | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Syncfusion® Essential Studio® Score6.1 out of 10 | Syncfusion® Essential Studio® Score6.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Progress Telerik Score10 out of 10 | Progress Telerik Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Progress Telerik Score10 out of 10 | Progress Telerik Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Bryntum | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.8 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.5 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.1 |
| Configurability | - | 8.2 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.1 |
| Bryntum | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Bryntum Screenshots | Progress Kendo UI Screenshots |














