TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BrowserStack

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ABrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.

    $0

    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    Percy - Free
    $0
    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
    App Percy - Free
    $0
    per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
    Test Observability - Unlimited Free
    $0
    Accessibility Testing - Free
    $0
    Test Observability - Observability Pro
    $0.01
    per month per test execution
    Percy - Desktop
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Core
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    Percy - Desktop & Mobile
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Cloud
    $0.03
    per month per screenshot
    Live - Desktop
    $29
    per month per user
    Live - Desktop & Mobile
    $39
    per month per user
    App Live - Individual
    $39
    per month per user
    Automate - Desktop
    $129
    per month 1 parallel test
    Live - Team
    $150
    per month 5 users
    App Live - Team
    $150
    per month 5 users
    Automate - Desktop & Mobile
    $199
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Automate - Device Cloud
    $199
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Live - Team Pro
    $199
    per month 5 users
    Accessibility Testing - Team
    $199
    per month 5 users
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
    $249
    per month 1 parallel test
    Automate - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Automate - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
    Contact Sales
    App Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Test Observability - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    BrowserStack
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others.

    From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    168 Answers
    74%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    138 Answers
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    169 Answers
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    114 Answers
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    140 Answers
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of BrowserStack and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    BrowserStack
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.223 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.922 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (191 ratings)
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (16 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    5.4
    (20 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.8
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    2.2
    (77 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.1
    (22 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    4.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.8
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    BrowserStack
    It's well suited to tracking down hard to find errors that are only affecting a tiny portion of customers often due to older browser compatibility. BrowserStack's Chrome extension also helps us find and address potential Accessibility issues with our sites. Not suitable for testing HTML email templates, but there are other platforms for that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    BrowserStack
    • Test client website on 5x more platform.
    • Provide a real device with features like media injection and Physical SIM testing for manual testing of a specific feature.
    • Automate regression suite to execute parallel on multiple device.
    • Provide an accessibility report for the website through automated scanning of the site using site.xml.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
    • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
    • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
    Read full review
    Cons
    BrowserStack
    • I wish it didn't time out so quickly. I often move back and forth between my native Mac OS system and browsers to BrowserStack for Windows browsers and it often times out so I have to start over.
    • I am not sure why, but when I've been testing in BrowserStack for a long period of time - maybe over a couple of hours, it sometimes gets buggy and unresponsive or slow to respond. It makes it hard to tell if I'm experiencing an issue with the site I'm testing or if it's an issue with BrowserStack.
    • If I'm wishing for the moon and stars, I'd ask for the ability to use BrowserStack to also test with JAWS screen reader. But I'm happy having NVDA.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
    • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    BrowserStack
    It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    BrowserStack
    It integrates directly in internal networks and local development. The point and click interface of choosing your device, pick the browser/version and you have a working emulation of that exact environment. What else could you ask for? I've set our least computer savvy users up with BrowserStack for testing in minutes. It feels like it's just part of your local environemnt.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    BrowserStack
    I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    BrowserStack
    The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    BrowserStack
    I'm saying a 10 for support for BrowserStack only based on feedback from the development team. I myself have never had to reach out to support for any questions or issues, but others in the company have. From my conversations with them, the support was fantastic and had been a pleasure working with the BrowserStack team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    BrowserStack
    Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    BrowserStack
    It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    BrowserStack
    I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack products has been found better for low code automations and visual regression techniques. We have been struggling to maintain the API endpoint sanity tests and writing a lot of code for them while releasing the builds, while we chose BrowserStack accessibility solutions, we found it a way easier than we thought and worked it up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    BrowserStack
    No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    BrowserStack
    I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    BrowserStack
    Not used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    BrowserStack
    • It reduced the cost of buying multiple devices as we have multiple devices access in it
    • Easily accessible from anywhere due to it cloud availability
    • Introducing this to our client also helped us in building trust as well as winning their confidence during deliverables
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive.
    • We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool.
    • The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BrowserStack Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Tricentis qTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards