TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BrowserStack

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ABrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.

    $0

    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots

    OpenText UFT One

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AUnified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A
    Pricing
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Editions & Modules
    Percy - Free
    $0
    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
    App Percy - Free
    $0
    per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
    Test Observability - Unlimited Free
    $0
    Accessibility Testing - Free
    $0
    Test Observability - Observability Pro
    $0.01
    per month per test execution
    Percy - Desktop
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Core
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    Percy - Desktop & Mobile
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Cloud
    $0.03
    per month per screenshot
    Live - Desktop
    $29
    per month per user
    Live - Desktop & Mobile
    $39
    per month per user
    App Live - Individual
    $39
    per month per user
    Automate - Desktop
    $129
    per month 1 parallel test
    Live - Team
    $150
    per month 5 users
    App Live - Team
    $150
    per month 5 users
    Automate - Desktop & Mobile
    $199
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Automate - Device Cloud
    $199
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Live - Team Pro
    $199
    per month 5 users
    Accessibility Testing - Team
    $199
    per month 5 users
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
    $249
    per month 1 parallel test
    Automate - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Automate - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
    Contact Sales
    App Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Test Observability - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Considered Both Products
    BrowserStack
    Chose BrowserStack
    BrowserStack by far is still the best tool we have for mobile and accessibility testing.
    Incentivized
    Chose BrowserStack
    It is one of the product which each software organisation should include in their end to end product development journey. I have explored other products in this category and I can proudly say that BrowserStack is a clear winner in terms of its Features, Performance and Product …
    Incentivized
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    168 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    138 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    169 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    114 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    140 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    ReadyAPI
    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.1 out of 10
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (191 ratings)
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (16 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    5.4
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.8
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    2.2
    (77 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.1
    (22 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    4.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.8
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BrowserStackOpenText UFT One
    Likelihood to Recommend
    BrowserStack
    It's well suited to tracking down hard to find errors that are only affecting a tiny portion of customers often due to older browser compatibility. BrowserStack's Chrome extension also helps us find and address potential Accessibility issues with our sites. Not suitable for testing HTML email templates, but there are other platforms for that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    UFT is well suited if the price is not an issue, and if the requirement is about testing different technologies. If the application is based on Legacy platforms like Siebel or Mainframe, UFT fares quite well. For low cost web-based projects, there are other cheap and open source tools available. If it is about API testing or Mobile Testing, it is better to use other tools like TOSCA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    BrowserStack
    • Test client website on 5x more platform.
    • Provide a real device with features like media injection and Physical SIM testing for manual testing of a specific feature.
    • Automate regression suite to execute parallel on multiple device.
    • Provide an accessibility report for the website through automated scanning of the site using site.xml.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The simple front end will allow novice users to easily grasp the basics of automation and give them confidence to try things for themselves.
    • UFT can scale up and run across multiple machines from a single controller, such as ALM, enabling hundreds of tests to be executed overnight.
    • There is an active support community out there, both official HPE based and independent users. This means if you do encounter a problem there is always someone out there to help you.
    • The later versions have many add-ins to plug in to other tools within the QA world.
    • Expert users are able to utilise the many native functions and also build their own to get the most out of the tool and impress people as they walk past and see the magic happening on the screen.
    • UFT also has LeanFT bundled with it, allowing automated testing at the api level - if you can convince the developers to let you in there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    BrowserStack
    • I wish it didn't time out so quickly. I often move back and forth between my native Mac OS system and browsers to BrowserStack for Windows browsers and it often times out so I have to start over.
    • I am not sure why, but when I've been testing in BrowserStack for a long period of time - maybe over a couple of hours, it sometimes gets buggy and unresponsive or slow to respond. It makes it hard to tell if I'm experiencing an issue with the site I'm testing or if it's an issue with BrowserStack.
    • If I'm wishing for the moon and stars, I'd ask for the ability to use BrowserStack to also test with JAWS screen reader. But I'm happy having NVDA.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Its licensing cost is very high making it a very expensive tool. due to this many organisations are exploring options of license free tools like Selenium for automation. Though learning curve is large in case of Selenium but it is very cost effective & you an get lot of support online for Selenium.
    • Though the scripting time is less since its easy to create automation scripts, the execution time is relatively higher as it takes the lot of CPU & RAM.
    • Though UFT is quite stable but during long execution cycles we do get frequent browser crashing issues.
    • In terms of costing TestComplete is also one option which is not free but comes with modular pricing. You can buy what you need, when you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    BrowserStack
    It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    BrowserStack
    It integrates directly in internal networks and local development. The point and click interface of choosing your device, pick the browser/version and you have a working emulation of that exact environment. What else could you ask for? I've set our least computer savvy users up with BrowserStack for testing in minutes. It feels like it's just part of your local environemnt.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    The ui is clean but there are lots of setting snd options which one must be fully aware so it will aid him/her during scripting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    BrowserStack
    I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    BrowserStack
    The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    BrowserStack
    I'm saying a 10 for support for BrowserStack only based on feedback from the development team. I myself have never had to reach out to support for any questions or issues, but others in the company have. From my conversations with them, the support was fantastic and had been a pleasure working with the BrowserStack team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HPE are quick to reply and it's possible to get through to the actual developers shuold the case warrent it. Their online system allows updates and tracking of all incedents raised.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    BrowserStack
    Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    BrowserStack
    It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    BrowserStack
    I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack products has been found better for low code automations and visual regression techniques. We have been struggling to maintain the API endpoint sanity tests and writing a lot of code for them while releasing the builds, while we chose BrowserStack accessibility solutions, we found it a way easier than we thought and worked it up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    1. It works solid for automate SAP and S/4 Hana applications and Fiori too. 2. Teams are well versed about UFT One 3. Able to handle maintained execution results 4. Publish Automation execution results in well manner to the leadership team/stake holders 5. More help content available 6. Able to understand non technical resources about normal view.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    BrowserStack
    No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    BrowserStack
    I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    BrowserStack
    Not used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    BrowserStack
    • It reduced the cost of buying multiple devices as we have multiple devices access in it
    • Easily accessible from anywhere due to it cloud availability
    • Introducing this to our client also helped us in building trust as well as winning their confidence during deliverables
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Reduces the total workload of keeping the team to test older (regression) functionality. QA testers can concentrate on ad-hoc and exploratory testing, saving time and effort across the entire project.
    • Has built a better infrastructure for the client applications on which we can rely on for stability and providing regression results for any new features being developed.
    • Led the applications a step closer to implementing agile practices and DevOps across the entire organization. Thus, providing a better turnaround time of new features to the customers and less maintenance headaches for the BAU team to address.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BrowserStack Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot