Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Foglight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Manager, formerly from CA Technologies, is a unified tool for systems monitoring and analytics. It offers multiple deployment options for IT teams and MSPs .N/A
Foglight
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Foglight is a database performance management suite from Quest, with modules to perform cloud analytics, network performance monitoring and virtualization management, scaling to a broad, cloud / virtualization focused IT infrastructure monitoring solution.N/A
Pricing
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Best Alternatives
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Small Businesses
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Icinga
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Zabbix
Zabbix
Score 8.7 out of 10
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementFoglight
Likelihood to Recommend
I've been really happy with the amount of performance data and reporting options that I've been able to get out of UIM. Performance hardware statistics take no more than a few mouse clicks. Also, as mentioned in the pros section, deployment and configuration is very intuitive and easy.
Read full review
It really depends on why my colleague is evaluating Foglight. If it is for Database monitoring and management, I highly recommend it. If it is for anything else, I would encourage them to look at others in this space.
Read full review
Pros
  • Server performance can be done exceptionally well with UIM. It monitors various OS flavors: POSIX (Aix, HPUX, Linux, Solaris, zLinux), and Windows.
  • With just a handful of probe s(CDM, NTevl, NTservices, NTperf, processes, logmon) your dashboards can be populated within minutes after installation of the product and discovering servers. One particular feature I like is MCS which allows you to perform template based monitoring which allows for implementing standards and including exceptions.
  • The SNMP collector monitors anything that is SNMP capable. With the ability to build a template out of templates here as well, you can standardize monitoring by device, vendor, or model regardless of device type: routers, switches, storage, load balancers, etc.
  • The UMP is the presentation layer. Without OOTB dashboards, you see quickly how your environment is performing. And with true multi-tenancy, you can separate data by customer.
Read full review
  • VMWare Monitoring
  • Custom use of scripts and dashboard
  • Performance Analysis for Database
  • Remote Monitoring for Linux and Windows.
Read full review
Cons
  • The use of flash in Dashboards
  • Integration with more alert options (Slack, for example), out of the box
  • Fast deploy also in the mainstream Linux Distros.
Read full review
  • Foglight allows detecting and diagnosing performance problems simplifying hybrid environments, it is a solution that has perfect features which work in a flexible and intuitive way, it allows database performance in a safe and fast way. It works perfectly with nothing else to add.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Meets our business requirements
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Easy to configure and use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Exceed Expectations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Plan it out based on your requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Basically, these other tools were easy to setup, I think sometimes even more that Nimsoft in some scenarios. But after you need to expand the size of the environment, or in big environments, for me, Nimsoft is the tool that allows you to grow with them. All of the other tools start to present problems in the database. When you need to think in bigger machines or start to "code inside the tool" to solve some performance problems, and other problems that appear. Nimsoft comes with a big set of documentation, and the support really works, as fast as you need, even as higher as you pay.
Read full review
Foglight was chosen years ago as a replacement for Groundwork. After 2.5 years of implementing Groundwork things were still not complete and the decision to go with a more formalized solution was made. Foglight installed easily and quickly nearly across the board and the full implementation for complex infrastructure was completed (with no Professional Services) by us in under 4 months. Nagios is a wonderful toolkit but you have to be ready to build what you need. It's flexibility and breadth are excellent features but with that comes the need to define things very tightly lest you embark on the project that never ends (see above about Groundwork). Dynatrace is an excellent APM tool and has advanced analytics but as a general infrastructure monitoring tool it is actually very expensive and to be honest does not have the same focus and full feature set that it does on it's APM (which to be fair is it's wheelhouse). vROPs (we also have) is a wonderful tool but focused (and rightly so) on satisfying the VMware engineers in the crowd and doesn't put itself out there too far to make things palatable for the non-engineering crowd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Low cost of ownership allows us to pass along the savings to our clients
  • As an MSP we are delivering support to our clients with a tool that does not add much to their monthly contract costs
Read full review
  • Positive - near instant alerts help combat potential problems quickly
  • Positive - minimizes business interruption
  • Positive - limits disruptions to productivity
Read full review
ScreenShots