Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud vs. Checkmarx

Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud

1 Reviews and Ratings

Checkmarx

21 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud	Score10 out of 10	N/A	Bridgecrew, now from Palo Alto Networks since the 2021 acquisition, aims to change the way teams secure their cloud infrastructure. By leveraging security-as-code, Bridgecrew’s platform identifies and automatically fixes cloud infrastructure misconfigurations in both run-time and build-time.	N/A
Checkmarx	Score9.1 out of 10	N/A	Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)	N/A

Pricing

Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud

Checkmarx

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud	Checkmarx
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Best Alternatives
	Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud	Checkmarx
Small Businesses	GitLab Score8.7 out of 10	Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitLab Score8.7 out of 10	Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	GitLab Score8.7 out of 10	Veracode Score8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud	Checkmarx
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (4 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Bridgecrew by Prisma Cloud	Checkmarx
Likelihood to Recommend	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans. Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review
Pros	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail. Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories. Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Cons	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx Scan duration False positives Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Usability	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Return on Investment	Palo Alto Networks No answers on this topic	Checkmarx Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence Improved confidence in application-level security Incentivized Verified User Read full review
ScreenShots