Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…
N/A
Foundry ABM
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Foundry ABM is an account based marketing platform that creates campaigns for ads, web personalization, and sales. Foundry’s proprietary database complements an organization’s first party data to provide the best data to reach, engage, and convert more stakeholders in target accounts.
N/A
Pricing
Bound
Foundry ABM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bound
Foundry ABM
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bound
Foundry ABM
Features
Bound
Foundry ABM
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Foundry ABM
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.8
Ratings
14% above category average
Foundry ABM
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Foundry ABM
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Bound
-
Ratings
Foundry ABM
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Syndicated content
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Personalization
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Engagement data tracking
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Bound
-
Ratings
Foundry ABM
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Ad campaign creation
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Display advertising
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Contextual advertising
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Social advertising
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
Bound
-
Ratings
Foundry ABM
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
3rd party intent signals
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Downstream intent signals
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Account identification
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Triblio is a relatively new platform for us, and it's our first ABM orchestration platform, so feedback is with those caveats. So far, the platform is well suited to targeting & serving ad messaging far more efficiently than we could ever do on our own. Triblio does NOT provide contact information like some "ABM/X" platforms do. Be aware of that. We understand and are OK with it - but some people confuse what an ABM platform should provide, and if you are expecting to have access to specific contact to enrich your targeting - that's not part of what Triblio does.
There are some additions we would like to see, such as a better experience in the Performance section. It'd be great if we could see an overall view of the metrics instead of having to drill down. We do a monthly KPI report which takes me a while to create due to the back and forth nature of comparing metrics within Get Smart Content. I also have to use Google Analytics to help with this.
We had some issues with the tool not updating Eloqua contacts, but that has since been resolved. The process for discovering the cause of the problem was lengthy and frustrating.
It would be great if you could see metrics of an A/B test within the campaign/rule, instead of having to go to the Performance section and find it. A small snapshot of info would be very helpful and it would allow us to compare and update the rule without leaving that page.
The ability to separate budgets by dept. currently, you have one pot of money but can set limits based on campaigns. This is fine for a single user but gets messy with multiple users.
Campaigns with multiple steps, I do hear this is in the works.
It would be nice if each area did not open a new tab, navigating pages within the same page would be nice.
We continue to have a good experience with Triblio, and they continue to deliver value for our money. If they would do a better job with analytics, then it'd be easier for me to tie campaign activities to the bottom line.
We have a cheaper version of Triblio, so we don't have all the bells and whistles. But, this works great for us. It's easy to use and the platform only includes things that we use instead of a handful of features that just slow it down. It looks like a simple version of Google Ads
The platform has always been available, and the occasional system updates aside, there have been no downtime issues with Triblio. The platform has always been available when I needed it, and campaigns were launched timely
Triblio pages, campaign performances, and platforms have not slowed us down at all. If anything, Triblio has enhanced how we engage with our target accounts. There has been no speed performance issues, or lag due to system limitations. Triblio tracking on our site has not slowed our page performances significantly, so there has been on effect on speed
If there's one thing Triblio excels at it's their support. We have an account manager that meets with us regularly to discuss any questions or even potential strategies. If we have questions that dive deeper into the software we've had an engineer get on the line with us. They are quick to notify us if bugs occur, and when they're fixed. They are quick to respond to emails as well. We are very supported by their team.
We had our Account management team online to provide training to the marketing team, ADR team, and the AE team, which was helpful as each team had their own sets of questions and needs from the platform. Having the Triblio experts on the call and knowing that they are available for questions later on was reassuring to everyone in the trainings.
Definitely have a dedicated technical team work on the implementation full time with the Triblio team. There are requirements on both ends of the pipe that needs to be done. It is much easier to have both teams work together full time as opposed to part time duty; it would take much longer than doing it all in one shot.
Get Smart Content is what we primarily use to serve up segmented content. The only other method or tool we've used to do so while leveraging our Demandbase variables is Optimizely. We selected Get Smart Content because they make the process of segmentation using Demandbase variables easy
As someone on the sales side, I don't know much about these tools' differences. However, I have had a very good experience with Triblio. It seems like it is more robust, and we can gain more information about our website visitors. I believe we picked them because of this reason.
The Triblio platform works fairly reliably since we have implemented it into our instance. There are the occasionally wishes that they have more functionalities, but those are feature requests which can be accommodated in future product enhancements. In terms of flexibility and scalability, we chose Triblio since we wanted to scale our ABM efforts, so that was a big part of our consideration.
The element of Sales Funnel in this tool is top-notch as it facilitates in keeping our sales team satisfied by augmenting prospects.
This product has proven to be an essential ingredient of success in my business, so if you want prosperity in your business, then this tool is worth trying.