Penelope vs. ClientTrack by Eccovia
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Penelope | Score6.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Bonterra’s Penelope is a configurable and secure case management system designed to help social good organizations save time for their staff, improve data quality and reporting, and better serve and connect with their participants. | $400 per year per user |
ClientTrack by Eccovia | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | ClientTrack is a case management SaaS platform hosted in Microsoft Azure. Using ClientTrack as a central hub for case management helps break down data silos that are all too frequent in health and human services. At its core, ClientTrack is a SQL database that enables organizations serving vulnerable populations to intake clients, assess their eligibility for needed services, and then refer them to those services. ClientTrack’s reporting tools allow organizations to gather client data… | N/A |
| Penelope | ClientTrack by Eccovia | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Penelope software is priced on a Named Active Users model, with a minimum of 25 users. There’s also a one-time fee for implementation of the software, and our Tailored Services team is available to quote on additional services as required. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Penelope | ClientTrack by Eccovia | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
70% Would buy again 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
85% Delivers good value for the price 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
87% Happy with the feature set 26 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
76% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Penelope | ClientTrack by Eccovia | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.9 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Penelope | ClientTrack by Eccovia | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | ClientTrack by Eccovia Screenshots |




