TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Bonterra Apricot

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Bonterra

Connect with Bonterra

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Bonterra so that Bonterra and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bonterra Apricot

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ABonterra Apricot is a cloud-based solution for nonprofits of all sizes. It's designed to bring data to the forefront in order to bolster a nonprofit organization’s impact. Apricot helps organizations to save time and resources because the tool makes managing data more efficient, so that users increase the time spent delivering the mission. Apricot offers configurable forms and fields so organizations can customize their experience to their clients and mission. It allows…N/A

    IBM Business Automation Workflow

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Business Automation Workflow is a solution that helps users automate digital workflows to increase productivity, efficiency and insights — on premises or on cloud.N/A
    Pricing
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPricing for Bonterra Case Management is driven by individual usage and needs of the nonprofit. Organizations aren't one-size fits all, so neither is Bonterra's pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Considered Both Products
    Bonterra
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    91%
    Would buy again
    84 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    63 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    85 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    79%
    Implementation went as expected
    46 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Bonterra Apricot and IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Feature
    Bonterra Apricot
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    10.0
    4 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Bonterra Apricot and IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Feature
    Bonterra Apricot
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    10.0
    4 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of Bonterra Apricot and IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Feature
    Bonterra Apricot
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    10.0
    3 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Bonterra Apricot and IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Feature
    Bonterra Apricot
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    10.0
    4 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Blueworks Live
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Blueworks Live
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (190 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    9.9
    (8 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (11 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    5.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    4.5
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    2.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Bonterra ApricotIBM Business Automation Workflow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Bonterra
    Our team has a lot of different steps to take in regard to their jobs. Apricot is very helpful in breaking everything down into separate folders that makes everyone's job more organized and flowing. Everything has a specific place, which also makes it easy to recognize if someone on the team is doing their job well or if someone needs additional training. The biggest flaw in Apricot is the Connect system, as I stated in a previous question. A big perk to Apricot in the beginning was being able to send out resources directly to a large group. However, not every resource is applicable for all families. We manage a large population of families, so it's very hard to organize it manually. There needs to be a way to filer out who we want to send things to right through the system instead of having to do it 1 by 1
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Have your process first on paper Its important to first document the process before venturing into BPMS. It will save a lot of pain and heartaches. A BPM tool is no magic bullet, it merely automates your process. Its upto you to put visibility and tracking on top of it. Provide monitoring so that you get a chance to improve your process continously. BPM is not an application If you are trying to build an application with BPM, chances are that your are alraedy failing. BPM must be a strategic initiative for an organization. Yes, you build Dashboards, Reports and other software in BPMS, however you do it at a process level not at an application level. http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2011/05/bpm-initiative.html Know the difference between process data and business data http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2011/05/lombardi-best-practices.html http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2012/02/bpm-system-architecture.html
    Read full review
    Pros
    Bonterra
    • Allows us to set notification reminders when residents of our program advance through out program
    • Allows us to create reports tailored to the information that we need
    • Allows us to update information efficiently and in real time so that everyone on the team can be on the same page.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • System does a great job normalizing business process and automating order processing tasks. Before TeamWorks, the process was much more manual and more expensive staff ($65k to $70K) were required to manage the process. Since implementing TeamWorks, we need much lower-skilled workers to manage order processing.
    • System ensures that we have consistent data across all systems.
    • Rules engine is really the “company playbook” – it is the heart and soul of how the company works. It handles thousands of orders per day
    Read full review
    Cons
    Bonterra
    • There are several things in the "suggestion" area that have been there for a while. For instance, to be able to see the client's age instead of just the birthdate. Many people want this, but I don't understand why it can't be done for us.
    • Luckily, whenever an issue arises, it's not there for long, as you have a fairly quick turnaround for resolving them.
    • Being able to view notes and other information sources with just a drop-down, instead of opening the entire note, would be preferred.
    • There are times when the system is just slow or doesn't work at all and it takes a little extra time for it to be resolved. This causes some stress.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The system gets crashed when many instances go into the queue stage. The system even crashes and sometimes restarts automatically when the load on the server increases. We had to develop a separate software for this and maintain the same.
    • We cannot manipulate the data during run time. It is difficult to develop user-interfaces with complex functionality.
    • In order to consume external services that follow HTTP protocol, we need to use IDE for that, and consuming services from IDE takes a lot of time to give a response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Bonterra
    I went to the Summit a few weeks ago to learn about the future expansion and vision of Social Solutions. I already been with Apricot for 5 years and researched other products I still come back to Apricot and where it can grow with us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    This particular decision will be made by other people. Overall IBM BPM is the best BPM engine that I have worked with. It is implemented at our company and IT and business are already somewhat familiar with it. Therefore if asked I will recommend renewal as long as the price is reasonable.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Bonterra
    Without any formal IT education, I was able to utilize their articles and videos to teach myself how to configure and customize the software to our organization (although I do recommend their Apricot Admin training to polish your skills). The majority of users are able to adapt immediately with minimal training.Staff that have challenges with technology in general do adapt to using the system once you can create buy in and engagement (although it does take time and training)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The system is easy enough to use but, by definition, is a complex tool. However, they have done a good job generally balancing tool complexity / capability with usability. When comparing to MS Biz Talk, for example, Biz Talk has less functionality but is actually harder to use.
    • Software is very flexible. For somebody with the right technical background, it’s quite easy to write some Java code to overcome any hurdles or make the product do what is needed
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Bonterra
    It is usually available when I need to use it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Bonterra
    The system does tend to run slowly when pulling more complex reports
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Bonterra
    This is a difficult question to answer because when I hear the word "support" I think of this in multiple levels. The customer service on the front end, with my account manager is pretty good. There was a time for about a year and a half where I didn't even want to get to know this persons name because they wouldn't be there there long enough for me to get to know them. For the past 8-9 months we've had the same account manager, and this is helpful as a way to grow our trust in Apricot social solutions as well as the account manager understanding the needs of our organization. The technical support is also fine. The issues we most have problems with is how the technical support is calculated and the lack of roll-over of technical support time. If our account has 1 hour of technical support per month, but we don't need any technical support for 4 months, it would be great to have the ability to use those 4 hours (as time allows per the IT calendar) when we need them, even if it falls within one month. We've also had instances of working with IT persons who didn't seem to care at all about our issues, and seemed eager to put our call behind them and get onto the next without much thought as to why we were calling them in the first place. We've also had instances where the IT person didn't seem to really be listening to what it is we needed, and was heck bent on what they THOUGHT we needed rather than listening to what we actually did need. While we also have had experiences of working with IT persons who were absolutely great at working through issues. They were patient and understanding and would explain why a solution (c)would or (c)would not work. We even worked through those options in real time if they were unsure whether a data solution would work or not. That was great because we felt heard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Issues can be raised through tickets and it works based on the priority of the issue. The Support Team response is also good and the solution is provided in a short span of time. In a case where the issue is serious, they try to find out the root cause and provide an alternative for it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Bonterra
    Online training only
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Attended on premise sysadmin training for 4 days, 8 hours per day. Although further follow-up training was available, I never felt the need to go back. Training was very hands-on with real modeling (rather than just following a manual). Very effective.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Bonterra
    There are good training guides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Bonterra
    There need to be specialists who know how to best work with an organization developing a new program, not just transferring existing forms to a digital format.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Very satisfied – not too difficult at all.
    • We had a consultant available as part of our contract, but we didn’t really need to use (except for some advice on ActiveDirectory and single sign-on)
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Bonterra
    We also use a state database called ETO that tracks case notes for our families, but doesn't give us the ability to analyze things like gross annual income growth for our families during their time in the program, # of housing applications completed, etc. It is solely used to track case notes regarding case management meeting content. Apricot allows us to generate statistics we can use to source funding and prove our efficiency as an organization as we continue to market our coaching model. ETO does not have this benefit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Pega Pega is a comprehensive suite which offers a unique theme of BPM development in the market. A no-coding approach based on rules with inheritance makes Pega a very powerful product. However Pega, falls short on integration centric capabilities and very rigid to customize. On the other hand IBM comes with array of products which suits needs of varying degree. Advanced integration is solved by BPEL Process Server which has support for state based patterns and mediation. Dynamic rules and event management can be solved with WODM, Cloud to on-premise connectivity with Cast Iron, Enterprise gateway and security usecases with DataPower, Social BPM with IBM BPM , WODM, mobify with Worklight. Pega has a little bit of eveything here and there. It solves the dynamic rule management, brings out the flavor of Social BPM and mobility with Antenna ( I guess) and predictive analytics as well in one single suite. There are certain usecases which needs to have a little bit of everything, however this little bits and pieces of functionality when its blows, Pega would have problems to scale. With IBM its a bit nightmare to maintain a variety of technologies, however you can wish to go for one without the other and go for something only when you truly need it. Pega vs IBM Its difficult to pick a winner. In nutshell when you want a full scale BPM with rich integration capabilities go for IBM BPM. On the other hand if you hava mature integration capability already, Pega can yield quick results for you as well. Pega's strength is its methodology. IBM BPM's strength is integration. Actually you can't go wrong with both in terms of implementation. My strong recommendation is to invest time to process analysis and pick a good vendor to support consulting and implementation.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Bonterra
    I have never had a problem with the system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It scales from small team interactions to business processes serving thousands of employees, as well as straight-through-processing needs that go well beyond. Of course, scale is always in the eye of the beholder, but IBM BPM does a good job of giving you all of the hooks, APIs, and data that you need to take on whatever scaling approaches you need to meet the load
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Bonterra
    • Consistent, accurate financial records of program spending are to be provided to Grant Funders.
    • One-stop shop for all program records, including past, current, and waitlisted clients.
    • Continued partnership with Grant Funders due to the ease on both sides with the Bonterra Apricot Software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It has added value to the upper management to give visibility into what is happening at any time in the enterprise.
    • Boosted employee morale because it gives them all the information to work the case/task in a single location.
    • Identifies bottlenecks and improves the turnover.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Bonterra Apricot Screenshots

    Screenshot of a display of a participant's profile to see important information about that individual at-a-glance.Screenshot of the "My Workspace" area of Bonterra Case Management, that allows users to see upcoming cases, appointments, events, and other notifications in one place.Screenshot of the dashboards that provide at-a-glance insights, while Census data integrations allows users to view demographics of the communities served.Screenshot of the streamlined intake process that helps serve more individuals and ensure they are aligned with the correct services to help them succeed.Screenshot of information, kept secure by assigning users specific roles and permissions to specify access levels.Screenshot of communication with participants to keep them engaged.