Bold Reports, by Syncfusion® vs. Progress Telerik

Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®

Progress Telerik

72 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	N/A	N/A	With the goal of simplifying how enterprises create, store, and share vital business reports, Syncfusion offers Bold Reports, a web-based report management solution. Bold Reports allows users to embed SSRS-compliant reporting tools, transforming data into actionable insights and giving businesses clear, accessible reporting. The Report Designer, which leverages Syncfusion’s UI expertise to provide dozens of report items, interactive features, appealing styles, and customizable formatting…	$5,940 per year (for one server)
Progress Telerik	Score10 out of 10	N/A	With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web	$999 per developer, royalty-free

Pricing

Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®

Progress Telerik

Standard: $495
Per month, billed annually Plan covers one server
Standard: $495
Per month, billed annually Plan covers one server
Scale: $795
Per month, billed annually Plan covers per cluster
Scale: $795
Per month, billed annually Plan covers per cluster
Application: $995
Per month, billed annually Plan covers per application
Application: $995
Per month, billed annually Plan covers per application
Custom: Custom quote

Individual Product Licence: $999
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft UI: $1,299
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Complete: $1,499
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Ultimate: $2,199
per developer, royalty-free

Pricing Offerings
Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	Progress Telerik
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	Progress Telerik
Considered Both Products	Syncfusion No answer on this topic	Progress Software No answer on this topic
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	96% Would buy again 25 Answers
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	91% Delivers good value for the price 21 Answers
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 20 Answers
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	96% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers

Best Alternatives
	Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	Progress Telerik
Small Businesses	Cyfe Score8.8 out of 10	Syncfusion® Essential Studio® Score6.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Zendesk Explore Score8.7 out of 10	D3.js Score8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Jaspersoft Community Edition Score9.7 out of 10	Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	Progress Telerik
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (41 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (5 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.5 (27 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (28 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (3 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Bold Reports, by Syncfusion®	Progress Telerik
Likelihood to Recommend	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software We have used the Telerik UI controls for our Admin user experience. We found that this lead to consistent user experience, with feature rich functions already provided. Effectively this meant that hour for hour, using the Telerik UI improved productivity in creating screens with more functions than using the default controls in ASP.NET. At this point most of our focus with the Telerik controls is User Interface oriented. Jeff Chesney Director Projects and Development Read full review
Pros	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software Easy to configure with application. It provides flexibility for complex grid customizations. Takes less time for quick development UI elements. UI is very responsible, which can be viewable in any device. Great support from Telerik team. It only takes 24 to 48 hours to resolve your issues. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Cons	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software I have not worked with the App Builder but I think a GUI for dragging and dropping components to build a web page would be great. In addition to the app builder there should some tools to design a responsive web application to see the results for different screen sizes. Incentivized Mehrzad Khoddam Sr. Software Developer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software The Telerik UI has become part of our staple development tools. We can not be as productive without the feature set available to us in the Telerik UI ASP.NET AJAX control package. Jeff Chesney Director Projects and Development Read full review
Usability	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software Progress Telerik UI is very usable and one of the best tools to use by the front-end development engineers in our team. It has helped us to improve the overall design of our existing and new applications. Also, the time to build applications has also been reduced effectively and we are able to focus on other areas of improvement to deliver a better user experience for our customers. Incentivized Shivani Pandey Project Engineer Read full review
Support Rating	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software Telerik UI support is what you are paying for. If something does not work you ask them for an example of how to solve your use case. The SEO on their sites is awesome and so well bedded into Google. The videos are good, [they're] not used much but their examples and DoJo examples make all the difference. Doug Thompson Full Stack Senior Developer Read full review
Implementation Rating	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software The controls work very well as long as they are used as intended. Built-in functionality should be used whenever possible, Incentivized Bill Weston IT Systems Development Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software Progress Telerik UI provides a large amount of language support, demos, and documentation. While the competition is still great in their own right, Progress Telerik UI has provided enough resources to cover a number of current and future projects without having to expand to other libraries. Incentivized Joshua Weeks Lead Software Engineer Read full review
Return on Investment	Syncfusion No answers on this topic	Progress Software Telerik enabled us to demonstrate our vision for new flagship software with only a years worth of effort. Telerik provided out of the box solutions for some of our more challenging UI problems. Telerik support has been extremely helpful and critical to our success. Incentivized Rich Moll Senior Software Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots	Bold Reports, by Syncfusion® Screenshots	Progress Telerik Screenshots