TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Board

    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Board is presented as an enterprise planning platform, offered as a solution to accelerate business performance and enable continuous planning with greater forecast accuracy to drive confident, aligned decisions.N/A

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ATagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
    Pricing
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Considered Both Products
    Board International
    No answer on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    16 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    16 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    Features
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    6.8
    93 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.1
    10 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports6.780 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards6.993 Ratings8.58 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates6.986 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    6.9
    98 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.8
    22 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Drill-down analysis6.996 Ratings6.222 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities6.294 Ratings6.922 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages6.966 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration7.689 Ratings6.914 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.2
    90 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.3
    14 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Publish to Web6.979 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Publish to PDF7.287 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Report Versioning6.980 Ratings7.712 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling7.678 Ratings9.310 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.3
    73 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.972 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.666 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics7.664 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.31 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.5
    74 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.1
    21 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)7.672 Ratings9.521 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model7.469 Ratings9.420 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.972 Ratings9.421 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)8.369 Ratings9.815 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    6.9
    77 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.1
    9 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access6.272 Ratings5.08 Ratings
    Mobile Application6.257 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.268 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.5
    79 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.4
    48 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Long-term financial planning7.674 Ratings8.134 Ratings
    Financial budgeting7.678 Ratings8.142 Ratings
    Forecasting6.775 Ratings8.239 Ratings
    Scenario modeling8.371 Ratings8.433 Ratings
    Management reporting7.677 Ratings8.945 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.3
    74 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.8
    44 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Financial data consolidation8.370 Ratings8.338 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports6.871 Ratings8.236 Ratings
    Multi-currency management7.661 Ratings8.333 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations7.662 Ratings9.436 Ratings
    Minority Ownership7.656 Ratings8.629 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting6.768 Ratings9.642 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails6.965 Ratings9.434 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.2
    77 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.7
    48 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting7.672 Ratings9.040 Ratings
    Management Reporting6.976 Ratings9.046 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting6.973 Ratings8.748 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting7.670 Ratings8.733 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing6.950 Ratings8.018 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.4
    79 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.2
    31 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Personalized dashboards7.678 Ratings8.426 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards7.674 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    KPIs6.976 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis7.672 Ratings8.322 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting7.671 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data7.462 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Board and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Board
    7.4
    77 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.4
    45 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Flat file integration7.476 Ratings9.339 Ratings
    Excel data integration7.475 Ratings9.643 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.371 Ratings9.330 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score10 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.2
    (99 ratings)
    8.7
    (49 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    8.3
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (5 ratings)
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (3 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    6.3
    (89 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    6.3
    (97 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BoardWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Board International
    Board is a useful tool with a great set of features. We migrated from human apps to board and we find it relatively fast in search results and better-managed threads and forums. There are some areas, such as UI and interactions which could be improved but overall a great product. The learning section is also pretty good.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
    Read full review
    Pros
    Board International
    • The user interface is intuitive and easy to navigate
    • You don't need programming knowledge to create dashboards which is a great flex for non-technical users
    • You can seamlessly convert large, raw, and complex data to meaningful reports to visualize better and plan to act accordingly
    • The financial forecasting that Board provides post-analysis is truly reliable
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
    • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
    • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
    • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
    • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Board International
    • Board BI tool has a steep learning curve and can be challenging for a new user to reach to board's full capacity.
    • We have to use a windows scheduler to schedule data import tasks; it would be great if Board could provide its own scheduler.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
    • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
    • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Board International
    Board is a fantastic product for swift BI solution delivery when compared with its peers. Ease of use, support and integration with Microsoft Office Addin open a wide horizon of opportunities for further enhancements to solutions. Easy bespoke app development capabilities make it a winner for us. BOARD is just like a white canvas, it lets you explore your creative side while designing and delivering a solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Board International
    From a user perspective, Board is quite simple to use. You
    can evaluate the presentation of the data, the navigation, the configuration of
    the users, the selection of the data etc ... It would have a better rating if
    it were even more intuitive as regards the construction of a project, starting
    from the database, to the info-cubes, to entities, to data acquisition
    procedures from other servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Board International
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Board International
    very fast and no integration problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Board International
    The only time I needed assistance was due to a problem in
    the prints: the colors of the brochures as they were on the screen were not
    reproduced in the print, but a series of standard colors were reproduced. This
    fact made colored numbers on a colored background illegible. From the
    assistance they confirmed that it was a problem of version 10.2 that occurred
    when leaving the brochures with the default colors proposed by Board. To obtain
    the desired colors, they had to be personalized ... I didn't like the solution
    very much and the technician who recommended it didn't like me either, but they
    would have solved the problem with the following versions. In any case, the
    assistance was quick and effective even if not exactly efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Board International
    Board is fairly simple and straight forward. Advance training on workflows and procedures is a good one but the training content only touches through the interesting areas. training content needs to cover a few areas more in-depth
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Board International
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Board International
    The problem of user profiling in our context is certainly
    quite complex. The complexity is given by the fact that the company is divided
    territorially into logistic points of sale, but at the same time they are
    virtually divided into divisions (or specific implementation areas) and points
    of sale of competence. The same operator can have access to data at different
    logistic sales points, sales points of competence and divisions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Board International
    Board has been more complete when compared to Anaplan. Although I didn't participate in the buying decision of any of those products I have used both and by far Board just has more features. It's more than a CPM, it's BI and CPM put together. If I had to make a choice now it would be Board.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Board International
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Board International
    • Board facilitates proactive decision making - it gives all the insights of the company's needs, which includes predictive analytics and manipulation of data to make different types of reports.
    • Easy to use for non-programmer and integration with other software is seamless. It has [the] ability to handle large amounts of data.
    • It facilitates advanced decision-making.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
    • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
    • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Board Screenshots

    Screenshot of PlanningScreenshot of Sales PlanningScreenshot of ProfitabilityScreenshot of GeomapScreenshot of ForecastScreenshot of Financial Plan

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

    Screenshot of Homepage