Bluebeam vs. CATPlan
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluebeam | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Bluebeam Revu is a PDF management, control, and editing tool. It enables collaboration and markup within shared documents across projects’ life cycles and has takeoff and bid creation capabilities. | $240 per year per user |
CATPlan | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | CATPlan is a web based document management system that can be used as a consolidated project solution, for tender documents or simply for sharing documents with the team. CATPlan has four phases which are Design, Tendering, Construction and after Project Maintenance, you choose which phases you use. Design Phase - The Design module functions through three phases of the project and is primarily for the design consultants to load and manage documents and project notices between the… | N/A |
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $550 Per Client Company | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing is individual for the company but typically an unlimited (jobs, users, documents, invitees) subscription very seldom exceeds $1,200 a month. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
95% Would buy again 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
94% Delivers good value for the price 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
95% Happy with the feature set 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction Project & Field Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimating |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | CMiC Construction Platform Score7.2 out of 10 | CMiC Construction Platform Score7.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Autodesk Build Score8.2 out of 10 | Autodesk Build Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | InEight Score8.3 out of 10 | InEight Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 1.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 1.0 | - |
| Bluebeam | CATPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Bluebeam Screenshots | CATPlan Screenshots |









