Luminate Planning from Blue Yonder headquartered in Scottsdale (formerly JDA Software Group) leverages a digital twin foundation to intelligently predict potential problems and opportunities, offer machine learning-based recommendations for action, and pivot production, inventory, and labor plans to minimize risk. It is an SCM platform that supports demand planning and inventory optimization, as well as production planning and supply network design, and replenishment.
N/A
Solid Commerce
Score4 out of 10
N/A
Solid Commerce is a cloud-based channel and marketplace selling solution that integrates with a number of marketplaces, along with the users ERP, warehouse management application, accounting system, etc. to provide integrated management of orders, inventory, and logistics, as well as get discounts on shipping with major carriers and manage content about products on all marketplaces.
N/A
Pricing
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Solid Commerce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Solid Commerce
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Solid Commerce
Supply Chain Planning
Comparison of Supply Chain Planning features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.0
3 Ratings
5% below category average
Solid Commerce
-
Ratings
Custom alerts
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scenario-based planning
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource optimization
6.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply forecasting
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capacity estimation
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee allocation
6.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply network coordination
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement Management
Comparison of Procurement Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.4
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Solid Commerce
-
Ratings
Raw material sourcing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply market analysis
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost analysis
6.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense Logging
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Fulfillment Management
Comparison of Order Fulfillment Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.7
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Solid Commerce
-
Ratings
Order fulfillment optimization
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Return services
5.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order generation
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order tracking
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier delivery scheduling
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing and product configurations generation
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics and Transportation Management
Comparison of Logistics and Transportation Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.9
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Solid Commerce
-
Ratings
Packaging
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Delivery planning
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Route optimization
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Shipping performance
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fleet management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse & Inventory Management
Comparison of Warehouse & Inventory Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.2
2 Ratings
9% below category average
Solid Commerce
-
Ratings
Automation of warehouse operations
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory storage
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Stock monitoring
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory tracking
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse asset management
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory and price forecasting
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Demand Management
Comparison of Demand Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Solid Commerce
JDA WMS is a tier 1 solution for warehousing environments. Due to its price, it may not be suitable for smaller operations. Since the system allows for multiple clients, and since my company is a 3PL, JDA WMS works well for 3PL providers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Solid Commerce may be helpful for small businesses that want to reach from one marketplace to become multi-channel based. However, I would recommend short contracts, long trial periods, request a teammate with 2+ years experience at the company and don't be afraid to communicate your needs. I do feel there is a place for the company in the marketplace, it is less expensive than most, it has a lot of benefits in segmentation and pricing needs, but it can lack in reliability and is not as reactive to customers for an e-commerce market.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As their company grew and our e-commerce department grew, Solid Commerce lacked in customer service.
At one point we could see a high turnover rate of Solid Commerce employees, leading to a disconnect for customers.
We had a hard time functioning with other external tools like ShipWorks, ShipStation, our DMS, even uploading using excel files became unreliable.
We ended our relationship with Solid Commerce less then a year ago because we could not rely on their automation and communication. They knew this for months before we decided to terminate the relationship.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
JDA WMS was a large step up from our legacy Infor solution. It filled many gaps that we couldn't fill with Infor's system. Rather than continuing to build solutions in-house to account for customer requirements, we decided to implement JDA WMS and use all of that system's capabilities to handled what we needed in our warehouses. Granted, Infor's solutions have probably improved since 2007 when we changed, but those were my experiences back when we changed WMS providers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ChannelAdvisor is a step up in building our e-commerce business. They have met our communication and customer service needs. They work with our other tools like e-Desk and ShipStation reliably. However, that step up comes with additional costs. ChannelAdvisor is an investment that is higher then Solid Commerce. However, we are about 10 months in and not once have we lost connection with ShipStation or not been able to print pick tickets
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info