Luminate Planning from Blue Yonder headquartered in Scottsdale (formerly JDA Software Group) leverages a digital twin foundation to intelligently predict potential problems and opportunities, offer machine learning-based recommendations for action, and pivot production, inventory, and labor plans to minimize risk. It is an SCM platform that supports demand planning and inventory optimization, as well as production planning and supply network design, and replenishment.
N/A
Board
Score9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Board is presented as an enterprise planning platform, offered as a solution to accelerate business performance and enable continuous planning with greater forecast accuracy to drive confident, aligned decisions.
N/A
Pricing
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Board
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Board
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Board
Supply Chain Planning
Comparison of Supply Chain Planning features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.0
3 Ratings
5% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Custom alerts
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scenario-based planning
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource optimization
6.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply forecasting
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capacity estimation
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee allocation
6.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply network coordination
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement Management
Comparison of Procurement Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.4
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Raw material sourcing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply market analysis
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost analysis
6.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense Logging
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Fulfillment Management
Comparison of Order Fulfillment Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.7
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Order fulfillment optimization
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Return services
5.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order generation
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order tracking
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier delivery scheduling
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing and product configurations generation
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics and Transportation Management
Comparison of Logistics and Transportation Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.9
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Packaging
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Delivery planning
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Route optimization
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Shipping performance
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fleet management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse & Inventory Management
Comparison of Warehouse & Inventory Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.2
2 Ratings
9% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Automation of warehouse operations
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory storage
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Stock monitoring
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory tracking
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse asset management
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory and price forecasting
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Demand Management
Comparison of Demand Management features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.1
2 Ratings
3% below category average
Board
-
Ratings
Demand signal sensing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Demand forecasting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer analytics
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory stock optimization
5.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales and operations planning
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing and promotion tracking
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
Board
6.8
93 Ratings
12% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
6.780 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
6.993 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
6.986 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
Board
6.9
98 Ratings
17% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
6.996 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
6.294 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
6.966 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
7.689 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
Feature
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
Board
7.2
90 Ratings
14% below category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
6.979 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
7.287 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
6.980 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
7.678 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Blue Yonder Luminate Planning and Board
JDA WMS is a tier 1 solution for warehousing environments. Due to its price, it may not be suitable for smaller operations. Since the system allows for multiple clients, and since my company is a 3PL, JDA WMS works well for 3PL providers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Board is a useful tool with a great set of features. We migrated from human apps to board and we find it relatively fast in search results and better-managed threads and forums. There are some areas, such as UI and interactions which could be improved but overall a great product. The learning section is also pretty good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Board is a fantastic product for swift BI solution delivery when compared with its peers. Ease of use, support and integration with Microsoft Office Addin open a wide horizon of opportunities for further enhancements to solutions. Easy bespoke app development capabilities make it a winner for us. BOARD is just like a white canvas, it lets you explore your creative side while designing and delivering a solution
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
From a user perspective, Board is quite simple to use. You can evaluate the presentation of the data, the navigation, the configuration of the users, the selection of the data etc ... It would have a better rating if it were even more intuitive as regards the construction of a project, starting from the database, to the info-cubes, to entities, to data acquisition procedures from other servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The only time I needed assistance was due to a problem in the prints: the colors of the brochures as they were on the screen were not reproduced in the print, but a series of standard colors were reproduced. This fact made colored numbers on a colored background illegible. From the assistance they confirmed that it was a problem of version 10.2 that occurred when leaving the brochures with the default colors proposed by Board. To obtain the desired colors, they had to be personalized ... I didn't like the solution very much and the technician who recommended it didn't like me either, but they would have solved the problem with the following versions. In any case, the assistance was quick and effective even if not exactly efficient.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Board is fairly simple and straight forward. Advance training on workflows and procedures is a good one but the training content only touches through the interesting areas. training content needs to cover a few areas more in-depth
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The problem of user profiling in our context is certainly quite complex. The complexity is given by the fact that the company is divided territorially into logistic points of sale, but at the same time they are virtually divided into divisions (or specific implementation areas) and points of sale of competence. The same operator can have access to data at different logistic sales points, sales points of competence and divisions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
JDA WMS was a large step up from our legacy Infor solution. It filled many gaps that we couldn't fill with Infor's system. Rather than continuing to build solutions in-house to account for customer requirements, we decided to implement JDA WMS and use all of that system's capabilities to handled what we needed in our warehouses. Granted, Infor's solutions have probably improved since 2007 when we changed, but those were my experiences back when we changed WMS providers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Board has been more complete when compared to Anaplan. Although I didn't participate in the buying decision of any of those products I have used both and by far Board just has more features. It's more than a CPM, it's BI and CPM put together. If I had to make a choice now it would be Board.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Board facilitates proactive decision making - it gives all the insights of the company's needs, which includes predictive analytics and manipulation of data to make different types of reports.
Easy to use for non-programmer and integration with other software is seamless. It has [the] ability to handle large amounts of data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info