Blue Yonder Luminate Logistics vs. Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud

It is more suited for a NON manufacturing site. It may not be the best with integrating with Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs). Do you have any kind of Wellness Reporting via dashboarding? Do you offer line supply via Directed work? What is your support model?

Incentivized

We use Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud to manage warehouses from small to big based on configuration the software we can manage multiple business functions like to create new flows of buying. I supposed where it is less appropriate would be when your business has a lot of customization inside, because this kind of tool does not fit in it.

Incentivized

• Provides great and reliable data to give feedback to your employees.
• Gives you data to see the true picture on effectiveness in youf production areas.
• The tools and reports are endless and can be used by the front line supervisor and the management team to see trend lines on performance and gaps that need to be closed.

Incentivized

• Material requisitions
• Dispatch
• Receiving reports
• Stock audits

Incentivized

• Quite user un-friendly database design; DB table names and column names don't give any clue about their purpose.
• Data separation is non-effective. This is NOT a software for a 3PL (3rd party logistics company). Multiple clients sharing the same warehouse share tables - such as the Item Master table - without a clear indication of the client's name.
• Several different tables for ItemMaster, way too complicated.
• System would reject new Items if the Item Color sent via EDI hasn't been codified before the Item Master upload. That is a problem for fashion clients that create many new color codes every season.
• Software requires SERVER reboot for every new change in order for the change to be effective. Unacceptable when many clients are on the same server and on a distributed organization.

Incentivized

• The support is still poor.
• Improve SLAs - it takes a lot of time to resolve our problems. Sometimes, things aren't completed in the way we need.
• Improve hardware.

Incentivized

Once these systems get installed, it becomes hard to justify switching out for different provider. For facilities that are using RedPrairie, it's unlikely we would change in the near future and should be renewing.

Incentivized

I found RedPraire to be the best system I have used of the years.

Incentivized

Because is slow, they don't know much and take a lot of time to resolve something.

Incentivized

RedPrairie is more expensive than Infor's solution that we used. However, it met our customer requirements much better than the Infor solution. Manhattan was similarly priced, but seemed to be less modification-friendly.

Incentivized

We are using these services in our warehouses for managing all our inventory and warehouses for almost 11 years now. With the help of this tool, we were able to track our inventory status more accurately and get a timely update if the inventory is low. It is highly flexible you can easily add new product information or change some information. The interface is very easy to use

Incentivized

• Warehousing errors were reduced by almost 12% with Blue Yonder Luminate Logistics.
• Order processing was done at more than 7% of the average TAT with the use of this service.
• End-user & ops team had higher productivity by almost 15% after integrating the service in day-to-day activities.

Incentivized

• We have reduced our manned power.
• Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud helped us to increase our productivity by system automation.
• We are managing our warehouse operations in a large numbers.

Incentivized