TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

BitLocker Drive Encryption vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BitLocker

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's BitLocker is an endpoint encryption option.

    $100

    One Time Fee

    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/ATrellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
    Pricing
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Editions & Modules
    Windows 10 Home
    $100.00
    One Time Fee
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    75%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of BitLocker Drive Encryption and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Feature
    BitLocker Drive Encryption
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.6
    1 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of BitLocker Drive Encryption and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Feature
    BitLocker Drive Encryption
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    30% below category average
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Symantec Encryption
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Trellix Complete Data Protection
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.0
    (14 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BitLockerTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It is well suited especially for users that access or store sensitive/confidential data on their computers. In the case of where users are accessing confidential data over the network, it is highly recommended to use Bitlocker to encrypt the computer. In the case where users are storing confidential data on their computer, it should be a requirement that BitLocker is used/enabled. It would be less appropriate if someone was using a computer and they were not dealing with any sensitive data, or in cases where the computer is used for recreational purposes (browsing the web, playing games, etc).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    [McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Encrypts the entire drive and provides a high level of security.
    • In an Active Directory environment, you can set up BitLocker to automatically save keys to AD.
    • As part of Windows, no additional licensing costs.
    • Set up and configuration is relatively easy.
    • Uses TPM module to increase security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
    • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
    • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
    • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Even if it's the best we tested, I think write performance could be improved. Maybe with dedicated hardware inside the TPM?
    • No integration with OS password is a shame as most others have it and it is Microsoft on Microsoft so they can probably do it better then anyone else and safer.
    • I wish they would support multiple passwords like FileVault on macOS. If it's a shared computer, you have to give the only password to Bitlocker to both users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
    • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
    • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Very easy to enable.
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Not good nor bad, BitLocker encryption is a symptom of our era, we need to protect ourselves and our data, BitLocker is a tool, as an IT we have to deal with it but it doesn't bring any benefit to my daily operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    BitLocker Drive Encryption solution offering is cheaper than the one that McAfee offers, it will help you with specific business concerns like "how many encrypted assets do I have?" it's easy to maintain, easy to deploy, and easy to track. It's best suited for companies that are not trying to go far away on the disk encryption matter
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • The biggest positive impact it has on ROI is the cost savings, since there is no cost to using the software.
    • Since it's widely available to anyone with a Windows computer, and the program is built into the operating system, there is no need to really install anything. This helps to save time of the IT department having to do installs, and also keep track of licensing, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
    • Keep your network environment up and running.
    • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
    • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
    • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots