Birdview vs. Structure by Tempo
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Birdview | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Easy Projects is a project management tool designed for a wide range of businesses (small to mid-sized and enterprise level). It includes both basic features like creating projects and tasks and filling in the calendar, and also some advanced ones, including an interactive Gantt chart, an executive dashboard, time tracking and billing. It provides integration with MS Outlook, is customizable and has SaaS/On-Premise options. | $15 per month |
Structure by Tempo | N/A | N/A | Structure for Jira, based on technology acquired by Tempo with ALM Works, is a ppm tool that enables users to visualize multiple Jira projects, programs, and portfolios in one place, so as to align execution with strategy. Structure’s hierarchies and spreadsheet-like views help users control their entire portfolio. It can be used for essential tasks across Jira teams and projects, such as project planning, reporting, sprint planning, and release management. | $10 per month per user |
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Services Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Any.do Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 | Microsoft Project Server Score7.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft To Do Score9.6 out of 10 | Planview PPM Pro Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.3 | - |
| Usability | 7.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.3 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 7.3 | - |
| Birdview | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Birdview Screenshots |









