BigID vs. Imperva Data Security

Add context to data to get a bigger picture and make decisions regarding compliance, privacy, coverage, security, and governance.

Incentivized

Compliance to audits and HiTrust certification. It is key in ensuring that our audits are completed in a timely manner with no repeats of data requests and that we also are HiTrust certified at our organization. Personally while the data obfuscation is available I am not sure I would fully trust that the data is completely sanitized if need be. It's not against the Imperva product but more of issue of data being used.

Incentivized

• Coverage for all types of data
• Ease of use
• Good support

Incentivized

• The options available for auditing are outstanding.
• The system has very good reliability and tuning options for the agents on the servers.
• The data gathered is fantastic and presented in a format that is easily readable for auditors.
• For on prem usage our servers have had no issues. The Linux is extremely resilient and we have no issues with the boxes.

Incentivized

• Mobile application isn't that user friendly
• Doesn't work with some legacy systems
• Blips and or latency in every day use.

Incentivized

• Alerts require a lot of tuning to get actionable intelligence
• Certain common encryption ciphers are incompatible with Imperva and have to be disabled at the server level
• Technical support is sometimes a little hard to work with

Affordable, scalable, seamlessly integrates with other applications, easy to configure and use. Great customer and product support. Affordable extended product support.

Incentivized

• Manage Enterprise data bolume
• Manage data sources
• Low impact on our system

Incentivized

• Allowed us to meet important compliance requirements.
• When protecting critical data, we can see exactly how it's being used and by whom.
• Licensing costs are very reasonable.
• It takes a fair amount of administration to use properly.