BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Carbon Black App Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, powered by PowerBroker and Avecto reduces the risk of privilege abuse by eliminating unnecessary privileges, and can elevate rights to Windows, Mac, Unix, Linux and network devices without hindering productivity.N/A
Carbon Black App Control
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Carbon Black App Control is an application control product, used to lock down servers and critical systems, prevent unwanted changes and ensure continuous compliance with regulatory mandates.N/A
Pricing
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Best Alternatives
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCarbon Black App Control
Likelihood to Recommend
It is an absolute must in all organizations where security is taken seriously. For organizations where there is a tendency among the users' end to abuse access privileges, this tool comes in handy. It has features that would enable the administrator to look through video logs to see what was done by a specific user. Also has the capability to terminate or lock users/ user sessions.
Read full review
It is more suited to lock down critical systems and servers to prevent unwanted changes, although you can use it on daily basis on laptops and desktops, it needs constant attention and events analysis. For some scenarios i.e. financial institutions it is a must-have solution, as App Control now is a requirement 5 of PCI DSS.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allow applications updates without IT need
  • Block dangerous applications
  • Block unknown applications
  • Elevate some windows basic function as installing local printer
Read full review
  • Device Control - you can view and allow/disallow the ability for certain devices to be used in your environment. Specifically we used this with USB drives. If you have one you want to use - whitelist the serial number. The rest can't be used. Simple and easy.
  • Software blocking. If you have an extremely dynamic software base (I doubt this is likely) this could get a bit annoying, but for most organizations like ours where we have specific applications that are required, and then the rest are a bit of an afterthought, it's easy to whitelist the correct applications that you want to be able to run in your environment. The rest can't run (in high enforcement). Users are able to easily request new applications, and you can set certain groups to be able to approve it on their own.
  • Solid platform - with few exceptions setting up new software was very easy (Dragon Medical was a bit tricky, but worked through it with support). Once you have your rules set up and the initial setup done, you tend not to have to do much of anything except to update on occasion and deal with a few requests for applications to be unblocked, or publishes approved.
Read full review
Cons
  • Better communication to customers on new release compatibility
  • Crowd-sourced rule logic for specific applications would be nice (I hear underway)
  • Technical support processes could be a bit improved
Read full review
  • More frequently updates of "Software Updaters".
  • Possibilities to tag within Yara rules.
  • Overall it is the best whitelisting solution I have used.
Read full review
Usability
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is really usable thanks to the Cloud platform that provide central management, analytics, updates and policy definitions. For policies, quickstart covers around 80% of the overall configuration and we just have to define home made applications and dedicated use cases. From the user perspective, messages can be customized so it's easy to understand for user and they have an endpoint application to follow workflows approval.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
We've had no availability issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We've had no performance issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The product performed to the level of our requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The in person training was great. Very informative and the trainer was great. I would highly recommend this option if you're hesitant. Any questions can then be directed to support. Support is great as well, and will definitely help answer any questions. I would definitely
recommend adding some type of training as it was very helpful for our
staff.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
It was informative and very helpful. They provide a lot of courses that give you exactly what is needed to manage the product. Any questions can then be directed to support. I would definitely recommend adding some type of training as it was very helpful for our staff. The online training sufficed for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
BeyondTrust was super helpful with implementation and it only took a few weeks to get it up and running.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management has more features than CyberArk and more detailed options for configurations. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is more focused on setting up access-related endpoints, which requires some fine tuning and understanding for use cases where a single endpoint has to be shared with multiple vendors. CyberArk's setup is more geared to users' accounts and then endpoint management under the user accounts.
Read full review
The big difference between Protect and Barkly/AMP is how exactly it goes about what it's doing. Protect is application whitelisting and program reputation. So the way it's protecting you is using a proprietary reputation service, and hash values to identify applications, and then hitting a list of whitelisted programs to decide if you are able to run that or not, based on the policy you are in. There is a LOT of value in that. We actually are working on transitioning to Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP). The main reason is cost (about the same cost as Cb Protect, but with (most of) the featureset of all 3 Carbon Black products for less than 1/3 of the total spend. AMP works differently, looking at a reputation service powered by Cisco's Talos cloud. You don't really have application whitelisting, but that also reduces how many "requests" you get for applications. So I'll have to find a different way to do whitelisting and USB blocking and the like, but I'm getting more visibility across my network and also built in antivirus (TETRA engine - ClamAV with some work). Barkly is an add that we are looking to put in as it looks at behavior of programs. So specifically it watches for privilege elevation and the like. Thus far all the big name problem children (WannaCry, other ransomware problems) have been caught natively in Barkly day 0.
Read full review
Scalability
It's very easy to deploy with minimal interruption.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We are able to securely monitor activity from vendors accessing our network.
  • This meets our cybersecurity objectives of securing our OT networks.
  • The benefits far outweigh the initial cost of the software.
Read full review
  • Dashboards are easy to understand for management
  • We feel more secure than we were on our previous platform
Read full review
ScreenShots