TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Berkman Lextree vs. IMS Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lextree

    N/A
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Lextree is software designed to track legal entities. The key features are described below. Create All Entity Types The software comes preconfigured with the following legal entity types: corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability limited partnership, limited liability company - manager managed, limited liability company - member managed, association, trust, estate, and cooperative. Users can easily add, edit…N/A

    IMS Platform

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AInvestor Management Services (IMS) headquartered in Charlotte offers the IMS Platform, an investor relations management platform that provides a more transparent reporting and documenting process for investors, with distribution workflow and waterfall calculator as well as waterfall audit.N/A
    Pricing
    LextreeIMS Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LextreeIMS Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup Fee$3,990 per clientNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsWe understand that you want to know the price to determine if Berkman Solutions meets your budget. We also know that Berkman Solutions licensing and services can meet any budget. Your needs and requirements differ from every other organization. We tailor the licensing and services to your specific needs.—
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    LextreeIMS Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LextreeIMS Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Berkman Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Investor Management Services (IMS)
    In our specific use case we used IMS to manage the investor acquisition process and manage reporting going forward. Basically, it's a powerful, real-estate focused CRM that understands our pain points and issues. Additionally, it was cost efficient for our organization since we weren't using any of the waterfall technology, nor did we have extensive complicated ownership structures that we needed to import. We were essentially starting from the beginning, with very few implementation needs. In this situation, the software worked perfectly. We have been very happy with the service and technology. That said, if you have an extensive investor relations apparatus and need something that requires a tremendous amount of implementation (i.e. an entire, existing, investor management system) it may be a more difficult process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Berkman Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Investor Management Services (IMS)
    • Investor Management
    • K-1 Distribution
    • New Investment Pages
    • Clear Dashboards
    • Customer Support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Berkman Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Investor Management Services (IMS)
    • Confusing UI (Hard to Use)
    • Implementation Issues
    • Missing Functionality
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Berkman Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Investor Management Services (IMS)
    We evaluated IMS against Juniper Square and the Crowdstreet white label platform. IMS came to the top for us because of our specific use case (i.e. less implementation needs, primarily investor acquisition and investor management). Also, at the time, IMS was way more cost effective for the functionality that was offered compared to its immediate competitors
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Berkman Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Investor Management Services (IMS)
    • Increased investor acquisition
    • Increase investor engagement
    • Saved significant time in managing investor
    • Massive time savings in K-1 distribution
    • High quality investor reporting system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots