TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

balenaCloud vs. Microsoft Azure IoT Central

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    balenaCloud

    N/AN/AbalenaCloud, from Balena headquartered in London, is presented as a container-based platform for deploying IoT applications, and boasts comprehensive device deployment and management infrastructure, hosted by Balena.N/A

    Azure IoT Central

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Azure IoT Central allows users to connect IoT devices to the cloud and offers centralized management to configure and updated connected devices.N/A
    Pricing
    balenaCloudAzure IoT Central
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    balenaCloudAzure IoT Central
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    balenaCloudAzure IoT Central
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    balenaCloudAzure IoT Central
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Balena
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Azure IoT Central has native integrations with Visual Studio (like pretty much all Microsoft products) making it pretty simple to publish apps to Azure App Service, where you can host all sorts of different applications. It does a really good job of storing large amounts of data (for instance, collected from IoT devices with various sensors) and it gets stored to multiple DBs. Azure IoT Central could improve by adding more customizations, as this would make troubleshooting the products easier and make future costs smaller and easier to predict.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Balena
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Good and approachable GUI
    • Many types of subscription configurations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Balena
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • central application
    • smartphone app
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Balena
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Before deciding to go with Microsoft Azure IoT Central, we considered Google, Datadog, and AWS alternatives. The reason we went with Azure was that the client was heavily invested in Microsoft technologies and Azure plays really well with other Microsoft products. The competitive products might be a little bit easier to set up, with more flexible pricing, but, the integrations with other Microsoft services were the deciding factor for our use case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Balena
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    • positive: connected huge number of machines as IoT devices and passed them through entire IoT pipeline until storage in a fairly short time
    • negative: we spent some time figuring out some "less-used" services because they aren't documented well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots