Azure Virtual Network vs. Scality ARTESCA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Network
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Virtual Network allows the user to gain granular control over network traffic, build a hybrid infrastructure, and create secure, isolated network topographies to run virtual machines and applications.N/A
Scality ARTESCA
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Scality in San Francisco offers scalable file and object storage for media, healthcare, cloud service providers, and others.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for booking demo and pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Small Businesses
Vultr
Vultr
Score 6.8 out of 10
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual NetworkScality ARTESCA
Likelihood to Recommend
For SAAS it's not required but for most of IAAS and PAAS components Virtual network are required the deployment of storage account doesn't require virtual network .
Read full review
When high availability and keeping sensitive information safe are top priority Scality is a great option and has good features that make it ideal for these type of applications. For small companies with limited resources to administer extensive systems Scality would not be a good match. It takes people dedicated to this platform to keep it functioning at its best.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows connectivity within Vnet
  • Secure Communication can be established
  • Security Rules can be enforced
  • Routing Can be Established
Read full review
  • It has a good evolutionary trend to stay alongside AWS as a leader.
  • The web-based Supervisor GUI and Grafana statistics allow you to drill down into historical data in many ways.
  • Easy for the end user to use.
  • The system works so well that we now use it for scalable file system storage and disk-to-disk backups.
Read full review
Cons
  • Integration of Express Routes needs to be simplified
  • Endpoints Security has to be available in Vnet itself
Read full review
  • From my limited experience, I have not seen anything that needs to be improved. I have found the product to be easy to use.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As an organization, it took us a while to understand the shift from a traditional black box SAN to software-defined storage, but now we are much more certain of what this means. The time invested and the resources were not very high, thanks on the one hand to the technical support and on the other to the coherence and good development of the platform.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have seen Scality in the office meeting with our VP and get the feeling that they are here to support us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
During Initial Phase itself on cloud Journey Azure Services was opted for there was no comparison done
Read full review
In reality, it did not become a substitute for AWS, since it allowed us to maintain a much more compact and rigid system by taking advantage of the support and evolutionary trend that Scality has and keeping AWS as a leader.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Deployment of Gateway needs to be faster as it takes a lot of time which is negative
Read full review
  • We have had a positive ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots