Azure Virtual Network vs. Huawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Network
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Virtual Network allows the user to gain granular control over network traffic, build a hybrid infrastructure, and create secure, isolated network topographies to run virtual machines and applications.N/A
Huawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) from Huawei Cloud enables users to create a secure, private, and isolated virtual network. The user can customize IP address ranges, subnets, security groups, and bandwidths, and assign Elastic IP (EIP) addresses.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual NetworkHuawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual NetworkHuawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual NetworkHuawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
User Ratings
Azure Virtual NetworkHuawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual NetworkHuawei Cloud Network Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Likelihood to Recommend
For SAAS it's not required but for most of IAAS and PAAS components Virtual network are required the deployment of storage account doesn't require virtual network .
Read full review
First and foremost, the cloud is a very secure and widely used platform for practically all businesses.I appreciate that Huawei Cloud is based on OpenStack Cloud, which is a widely used platform, and that you can obtain specifics for each component of OpenStack Cloud on the internet. Using this cloud service makes us feel like we're running a datacenter through a GUI.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows connectivity within Vnet
  • Secure Communication can be established
  • Security Rules can be enforced
  • Routing Can be Established
Read full review
  • Isolated private networks on the cloud
  • Two-way migration feature
  • Flexible network deployment
Read full review
Cons
  • Integration of Express Routes needs to be simplified
  • Endpoints Security has to be available in Vnet itself
Read full review
  • It's a little tricky to use, you will need training for maintenance
  • UI can be changed a bit in order to make it more user-friendly
  • Sometimes has scaling issues
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
During Initial Phase itself on cloud Journey Azure Services was opted for there was no comparison done
Read full review
It stacks pretty against some of them, but the main issue this platform faces is scaling. So I feel that, if we take accessibility into account, it beats almost all of its competitors but apart from that if we take UI and flexibility into account, it lacks a lot of features as compared to its competitors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Deployment of Gateway needs to be faster as it takes a lot of time which is negative
Read full review
  • Solved a huge issue of accessibility from different geographical zones
  • Since it was cheaper than the current one, this business decision did save some costs
  • Helped solving concurrent transaction saving issues
Read full review
ScreenShots