TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Virtual Network Manager vs. Cisco UCS Manager

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Virtual Network Manager

    N/AN/AAzure Virtual Network Manager, available on Microsoft's Azure suite of services, is a a central management service for virtual network resources, that enables users to centrally manage virtual networks in Azure from a single pane of glass.

    $0.10

    per hour per subscription managed

    Cisco UCS Manager

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/ACisco UCS Manager supports the entire Cisco UCS server and Cisco HyperFlex Series hyperconverged infrastructure portfolios. It enables server, fabric, and storage provisioning as well as, device discovery, inventory, configuration, diagnostics, monitoring, fault detection, auditing, and statistics collection.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    14 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Cyberduck
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
    Score10 out of 10
    AWS Storage Gateway
    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter
    Score9 out of 10
    SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor (SRM)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Virtual Network ManagerCisco UCS Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It [Cisco UCS Manager] is extremely well suited to large virtual infrastructure environments with resource dense blades. This solution is also great if you want to consolidate a large number of servers (if they are servers that need to stay physical, but can fit in the profile of a blade) - this would reduce data center space utilization as well as power and cooling. Cisco UCS Manager is also great if you're looking for centralized management of a larger number of servers. This would not be a great solution if you have a very small shop - it's not cheap and probably wouldn't give you a ROI if you only have a couple dozen servers total. I'd say it would be overkill for small shops, but if you have the money and don't care, you'll still like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • It is very all inclusive for management of every part our our Cisco blade center.
    • It allows us to directly connect to a hardware-based server in the blade center as though we were physically at the console.
    • It allows us to monitor the entire system for faults.
    • It lets us manage connectivity.
    • It is set to alert us via email if a fault occurs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • Automation: There is a simple power-shell CMD lets, but it leaves more to be desired.
    • Navigation: Navigating the interface can be confusing.
    • Integration: Integration with ESXi hosts while doing FW upgrades would be hugely beneficial without the need for additional tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Cisco UCS Manager allows for integrated management of all UCS components, streamlining processes like server provisioning, networking, and storage configuration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    The automation capabilities of Cisco UCS Manager help streamline tasks such as provisioning, configuration, and monitoring, leading to increased efficiency
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Cisco UCSM Support has been very quick to reply and address our concerns, issues, and questions. We have found that Cisco's documentation is clear and concise and fairly easy to find. With Cisco support's help, we are able to quickly and safely meet the demands of our end-users, consistently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I think UCS Manager would be able very comparable to other vendors offerings when it comes to server configuration. I think Cisco did a good job in giving you full access to many options that you might not see with Dell or HPE. Every manufacturer would need a similar tool to control their server environment, but I think what Cisco has built into their Manager is a little better than others I've used. You can just see and change so many settings. I would say that is also a bit of a negative by a little bit because sometimes it is hard to dig in and find what you need to change and often might need to reach out to TAC or take a training course to understand all of the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    • The positive is I was able to consolidate my small server infrastructure from 3 racks to one rack giving me space back and much power savings
    • The negative would be it could feel a little daunting to manage as there are many tabs and pieces to the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots