Azure Virtual Desktop vs. OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

1. Users with older machines and when the IT department is facing the crunch in procuring the actual system due to ongoing pandemic.
2. Users with more computing power can use these machines, which can work at better speeds and give out better results and faster speed.
3. If the end user internet is not perfect that is it is low speed or ping then it is not recommended to use these systems

Incentivized

It is very well suited to large, diverse organizations looking to quickly deploy applications virtually to its employee base. They give immense control to system
Admins and allow users to more easily install the applications they need. They also allow users quick access to their applications, even during migration.

Incentivized

• You can publish as many host pools as you need to accommodate your diverse workloads
• Brings your own image for production workloads or test from the Azure Gallery
• Reduces costs with pooled, multi-session resources.
• With the new Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session capability exclusive to Windows Virtual Desktop and Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) role on Windows Server, you can greatly reduce the number of virtual machines and operating system (OS) overhead while still providing the same resources to your users.

Incentivized

• It allowed us to isolate applications so that they did not adversely interact with other applications.
• They served as a virtual machine while we managed the migration to a new OS.
• They helped us decrease malicious attacks because web browsers operating within a container could be terminated if an attack occurred.
• They allowed us to quickly deploy applications across a diverse, global organization.

Incentivized

• While it is PaaS it would be nice to have some monitoring insights into some parts of the offering
• Migrating user sessions from one host to another (to be able to downscale) would be awesome
• It would be nice to have a more seamless deployment of FSLogix in a AVD Enviroment

Incentivized

• Container access and restrictions were a bit cumbersome to set up.
• We would frequently have users report containers failing to work properly due to file size.
• There was very little documentation we could provide to users during onboarding

Incentivized

AVD has performed well for us and allowed us to migrate away from Citrix.

Incentivized

For us Parallels RAS is still more a "onpremise" solution, with Azure Virtual Desktop we can really leverage the power of the cloud. We can spin up additional hosts if the load is too high and spin down hosts in the night to cut costs. Not being bound to onpremise hardware makes this extremely flexible. Seeing as most of our customers already have a M365 license that includes Azure Virtual Desktop licensing it doesn't cost us additional CAL's for Parallels RAS

Incentivized

We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization.

Incentivized

• More people can work from home which is a positive contribution to company’s objective of promoting work life balance
• Reduced building operating costs with more staff working from home
• At any point in time
• Significantly reduced loss of data if a
• user loses or damages a work laptop

Incentivized

• We were able to migrate to a different OS 50% more quickly than in the past.
• We saw a dramatic decrease in malicious attacks while using this product.
• Our users were able to more quickly get access to the products they needed.
• We no longer needed to worry about applications not playing nice with others since they were isolated

Incentivized