Azure Virtual Desktop vs. Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Desktop
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Azure Virtual Desktops are a comprehensive desktop and app virtualization service running in the cloud.N/A
Microsoft App-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft App-V supports the virtualization of applications, making them available to end users without an installation.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft App-V
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Features
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Application Virtualization
Comparison of Application Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Virtual Desktop
-
Ratings
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
7.6
Ratings
0% above category average
Application support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Device support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ease of deployment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Application packaging00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Security00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Parallels Desktop for Mac
Parallels Desktop for Mac
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 5.5 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 5.5 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual DesktopMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
Likelihood to Recommend
  1. Users with older machines and when the IT department is facing the crunch in procuring the actual system due to ongoing pandemic.
  2. Users with more computing power can use these machines, which can work at better speeds and give out better results and faster speed.
  3. If the end user internet is not perfect that is it is low speed or ping then it is not recommended to use these systems
Read full review
For large organizations that need software to update at the control of the IT department APP-V is a godsend to manage deployment based on AD group assignment, maintaining software versioning for specific services or upgrades, and areas where you need to make software available without having to install the entire package - the streaming portion of APP-v publishes a shortcut on the desktop, then streams the install on demand
Read full review
Pros
  • You can publish as many host pools as you need to accommodate your diverse workloads
  • Brings your own image for production workloads or test from the Azure Gallery
  • Reduces costs with pooled, multi-session resources.
  • With the new Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session capability exclusive to Windows Virtual Desktop and Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) role on Windows Server, you can greatly reduce the number of virtual machines and operating system (OS) overhead while still providing the same resources to your users.
Read full review
  • It's incredibly customizable, integrates with Microsoft 365, and allows you to screen share with colleagues without even phoning them!
  • Call quality is excellent, and the user interface is basic and intuitive enough that there is no need for any training.
  • The user interface (UI) is quite professional, and it makes it simple to identify and operate the many features. And we record all of our meetings using Microsoft Teams as well.
  • In my opinion, it's an excellent file-sharing application, and the ability to change the theme to dark is a personal preference.
Read full review
Cons
  • While it is PaaS it would be nice to have some monitoring insights into some parts of the offering
  • Migrating user sessions from one host to another (to be able to downscale) would be awesome
  • It would be nice to have a more seamless deployment of FSLogix in a AVD Enviroment
Read full review
  • Complicated software installs of interacting software needs significant care
  • Updating software requires a pristine virtual machine to update a packager
  • No longer being updated so new software practices aren't correctly captured.
Read full review
Usability
AVD has performed well for us and allowed us to migrate away from Citrix.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
APP-V is no longer a supported technology and is on the way out, only on legacy support at this time. The changes in security emphasis in windows, as well as the changes in software development have meant that APP-V is no longer able to correctly package software. It has been superseded by the MSIX format and distribution via the Microsoft Store for Business.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For us Parallels RAS is still more a "onpremise" solution, with Azure Virtual Desktop we can really leverage the power of the cloud. We can spin up additional hosts if the load is too high and spin down hosts in the night to cut costs. Not being bound to onpremise hardware makes this extremely flexible. Seeing as most of our customers already have a M365 license that includes Azure Virtual Desktop licensing it doesn't cost us additional CAL's for Parallels RAS
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is included in our current Office 365 product set; therefore, there is no additional fee to use the application. It saves our company money by not having to pay for Slack or another internal chat service. For us, Microsoft Teams has a better user experience and product features. Teams' usability is higher than Slack's since it has access to OneDrive, email, and OneNote applications. Screen sharing, chat, and file-sharing operate smoothly, and the performance appears great.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • More people can work from home which is a positive contribution to company’s objective of promoting work life balance
  • Reduced building operating costs with more staff working from home
  • At any point in time
  • Significantly reduced loss of data if a
  • user loses or damages a work laptop
Read full review
  • Some applications may be slower
  • Interaction between several applications can be better
Read full review
ScreenShots