TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Test Plans

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAzure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A

    PractiTest

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.

    $39

    user

    Pricing
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Professional
    $39.00
    user
    Enterprise
    $49.00
    user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    PractiTest
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Azure Test Plans and PractiTest
    Feature
    Azure Test Plans
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    4% above category average
    PractiTest
    8.5
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Centralized test management8.86 Ratings9.24 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.56 Ratings8.44 Ratings
    Test execution reporting9.36 Ratings8.44 Ratings
    Defect management7.46 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Test PlansPractiTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Multi test plan access
    • Well structured and easy to use
    • Integrates with other azure features to work seamlessly ,connecting the data flow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Effective Test case template.
    • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
    • Report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
    • Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
    • Basic cost module to design test budgets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    PractiTest
    The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We're doing a full continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), continuous testing (CT), security, delivery, and monitoring. They have been lately adding features to the services on a regular basis. Every two weeks, they add functionality to Azure DevOps Services to match it with what Azure DevOps Server or on-prem would offer. So, we continue to get more robust functionality. My favorite right now is that they are starting to open up the API availability within Azure DevOps Services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Pros: One stop solution for end to end traceability
    • Pros: Exploratory testing used
    • Pros: maximum coverage on multiple browsers, operating system combinations
    • Cons: Integration with Non-Microsoft tools can be improved
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Test Reporting
    • Defect Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    PractiTest Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot