Azure Test Plans vs. EasyQA

It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.

Incentivized

The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.

Incentivized

• Integration with Azure Boards
• Integration with Visual Studio 2022
• Automation using Pipelines and releases
• Real time dashboards
• Integration with code repositories

Incentivized

• Creation of test cases for new features
• Management of created bugs
• Bug tracking and analysis

Incentivized

• Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
• Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
• Basic cost module to design test budgets.

Incentivized

• In my experience, they provide poor support
• The application is still a bit buggy

Incentivized

Test rail feels quite dated compared to Azure Test plans and Devops as a whole. Functionality and ease of use is actually night and day.

The ability to create structured test plans with ease that can be traced and attached to Epics and stories with relevant tasks allows the system to feel superior in everyway compared to Test rail which had a slow web interface

Incentivized

• Typically the sprints themselves and managing the tasks have essentially eliminated our need for reporting.
• The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure DevOps are high-level protection. Protection is very important to the customers to prevent eavesdropping.

Incentivized