Azure Service Bus vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Service Bus
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers Azure Service Bus as a reliable cloud messaging as a service (MaaS) and simple hybrid integration solution.N/A
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Google offers Cloud Pub/Sub, a managed message oriented middleware supporting many-to-many asynchronous messaging between applications.N/A
Pricing
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Best Alternatives
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Service BusGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Likelihood to Recommend
If you need a cloud-based service bus or a simple to use queue/topic/routing/pub-sub service, then Azure Service Bus is a very good choice at a reasonable price and performance. Typically on-premise we'd use RabbitMQ because it "just works", but if you're building a "cloud-first" application, then this is the one to go with. It's especially easy to integrate with if you're already embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Read full review
Using Google Cloud Pub/Sub will mainly depend on the cloud platform used. Our client didn't choose GCP for Google Cloud Pub/Sub, if we went with AWS we would be using SNS/SQS (obviously). However, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a better solution in the GCP services compared to self-managed solutions such as RabbitMQ for instance (it is managed by GCP and integrates with GCP solutions).
Read full review
Pros
  • Acting as a basic queuing service it works very well.
  • One of the best parts is that Azure Service Bus can work over HTTPS which helps in strict firewall situations. There is a performance hit if you choose to use HTTPS.
  • The routing capabilities are quite good when using topics and subscriptions. You can apply filters using a pseudo-SQL-like language though the correlation filters are quick and easy options.
  • Costs are very reasonable at low-ish volumes. If you're processing 10's of millions of messages a month... it may be a different story.
Read full review
  • A hands-off approach to publishing messages and subscribing to topics.
  • Easy to use APIs.
  • Useful, simple UI on cloud console to send messages for debugging, etc.
Read full review
Cons
  • The SqlFilter could be a little easier to use, but it's not terrible.
  • The performance while using HTTPS for the connection is a little slow compared to direct connections using AMQP ports.
  • There is a size limit to the message - unlike RMQ for instance, Azure Service Bus caps messages to 256kb on the standard tier.
Read full review
  • It is limited to work with the same platform but with different datasets at the same time, you must request a prior security authentication.
  • It can sometimes lead to unexpected charges, as Pub/Sub will automatically keep on retrying messages continuously, even if failures are due to permanent code-level issues.
  • Message re-deliveries don't apply for ingested services like with Python based client. Push messages tried to be delivered immediately and if your service is busy dealing with some other task, it won't be done OR goes into a queue
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It serves all of our purposes in the most transparent way I can imagine, after seeing other message queueing providers, I can only attest to its quality.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It has many libraries in many languages, google provides either good guides or they're AI generated code libraries that are easy to understand. It has very good observability too.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I have never faced a single problem in 4 years.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It's very fast, can be even better if you use protobuf.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They have decent documentation, but you need to pay for support. We weren't able to answer all our questions with the documentation and didn't have time to setup support before we needed it so I can't give it a higher rating but I think it tends to be a bit slow unless you're a GCP enterprise support customer.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
RabbitMQ is simple and awesome... but so is Azure Service Bus. Both accomplish the same thing but in different environments. If you're building a cloud-native application - especially one that is serverless by design - Azure Service Bus is the only real choice in Azure. It works well, it's performance, and it's reasonably priced in the Standard tier. From our testing, RMQ is more performant, but it's hard to compare service-based implementations vs RMQ installed on VMs.
Read full review
  • Easy to setup Publisher, Subscribers and Message Queue service
  • More Reliable and Easy Scalable with Google Managed services
  • Easily integrated with most of the data sources we typically use for Data Storage and Analysis
  • 10k Topics is a good enough number to build and deliver the business use cases
  • Asynchronous and fallback mechanisms are great to ensure parallel delivery of the messages
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
You can just plug in consumers at will and it will respond, there's no need for further configuration or introducing new concepts. You have a queue, if it's slow, you plug in more consumers to process more messages: simple as that.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Compared to open-source free software like RMQ, Azure Service Bus does have some costs to it. But the cost is reasonable.
  • Also unlike RMQ, Azure Service Bus doesn't require you to stand up any hardware - so it's very easy to use and saves time/money from that perspective.
Read full review
  • Pub/Sub has helped avoid data loss improving our customer value prop.
  • Pub/Sub has reduced development time that would otherwise be needed to build a highly scalable queue.
Read full review
ScreenShots