Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Azure NetApp Files | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers. | $0.02 per month |
IBM Cloud File Storage | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS. | N/A |
| Azure NetApp Files | IBM Cloud File Storage | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Azure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 93% Would buy again 37 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 97% Delivers good value for the price 38 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 90% Happy with the feature set 36 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 29 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 91% Implementation went as expected 32 Answers | |
| Azure NetApp Files | IBM Cloud File Storage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Azure NetApp Files | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Pros | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |