TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure NetApp Files vs. IBM Cloud File Storage

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure NetApp Files

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AAzure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers.

    $0.02

    per month

    IBM Cloud File Storage

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Editions & Modules
    Restore
    $0.02/GiB
    per month
    Backup
    $0.05/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Daily - Replication frequency is once a day
    $0.11/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Hourly - Replication frequency is every 1 hour
    $0.12/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Minutes - Replication frequency is every 10 mins
    $0.14/GiB
    per month
    Standard Storage
    $0.14746 per GiB
    per month
    Premium Storage
    $0.29419 per GiB
    per month
    Ultra Storage
    $0.39274 per GiB
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAzure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Considered Both Products
    NetApp
    Chose Azure NetApp Files
    Azure NetApp Files is very well integrated with Microsoft Azure, we use the same request methods that everyone knows from Azure. NetApp and Microsoft has built a very efficient solution that allows you to transfer virtually any service to the Microsoft public cloud. Azure …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    37 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    38 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    36 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    29 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    32 Answers
    Features
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Azure NetApp Files and IBM Cloud File Storage
    Feature
    Azure NetApp Files
    7.7
    8 Ratings
    4% below category average
    IBM Cloud File Storage
    8.5
    39 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.18 Ratings9.737 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling7.18 Ratings8.836 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing8.17 Ratings8.135 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates8.07 Ratings7.631 Ratings
    Monitoring tools7.18 Ratings8.037 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images8.06 Ratings8.133 Ratings
    Operating system support8.18 Ratings9.636 Ratings
    Security controls7.18 Ratings9.437 Ratings
    Automation8.01 Ratings7.030 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.8
    (40 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    NetApp
    • It does not support file locking although its available as an add-on
    • Design is far from native and has a learning curve
    • We would like to have backup functionality built in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • We have sometimes experienced some outages and hope IBM will fix this soon.
    • Initial trainings are required for the teams to work and do the setup.
    • Support documentation from IBM needs improvement with [the] inclusion of more detailed steps and video tutorials for [a] better understanding of the engineers.
    • The billing process is very complex and you may have to incur additional overhead. Need a simpler approach and clarity on this aspect.
    • Support response from the IBM team is very slow and lacks information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM Cloud File Storage is a valuable tool in the arsenal of any small business. It's flexibility combined with its ease of use ensure that there is low operational overhead, combined with a solid return on investment. It's role based access control features combined with sharing capabilities make it a significant win for any business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The IBM team provides effective support for all the cloud operations. They tracks operations and database functionalities closely to enhance reliable operations and remove inefficiencies that affect work processes. The support team has prepared video tutorials and manuals that guides our members on how to work with the database systems effectively.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The IBM Professional services provided the re4quired infrastructure for getting the best out of this tool. It offered excellent guidelines that enhanced efficient integrations. The organization was pleased with the setup process that was completed quickly than expected. The application has been operation effectively after deployment. We have continued to get support from the IBM support team when there are challenges.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM Cloud File Storage, unlike other similar products, offers excellent Cloud data security and its overall data management quality on IBM Cloud File Storage is incredible and its data integration support is perfect because it allows big data migration across many Cloud platforms for effective data analytics generation and data visualization tools are great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    NetApp
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Compared with company datacenter require less maintenance time with an incomparable high availability and business continuity features
    • The possibility to move snapshots on other data centers let this solution super scalable worldwide
    • The price for gb let us pay what we need without a pre commissioned storage buy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots