Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Cloud Storage
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Azure NetApp Files | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers. | $0.02 per month |
Google Cloud Storage | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Storage is unified object storage for developers and enterprises. | N/A |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Cloud Storage | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Azure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Cloud Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 100% Would buy again 16 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 15 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Cloud Storage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Cloud Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.8 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Cloud Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |






