Azure Logic Apps vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Features
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.5
Ratings
6% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Logic AppsUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
1. For simple tasks / moderately difficult tasks (where there are not too many condition checks) 2. We have less time for development, and the Agenda is simple. 3. Avoid Azure Logic Apps when you are unsure about hitting the limits (check latest limitations of Azure Logic Apps in MS docs)
Read full review
Areas where it would be appropriate:
  1. If you want a really 'deep' integration with a third party software, and you want all the control over how it interacts with your software
  2. If you want a totally white-labeled solution, that is totally invisible to your customers.
  3. if you care more about a well thought out/useful API, rather than a pretty UI
Areas where it is less appropriate:
  1. If you want a Zapier-esque hands-off integration for YOU.
  2. if you want your customers to do more of the work, pay for it/etc.
  3. if you're a really small business, it could be too expensive. But it depends on your individual contract with them.
Read full review
Pros
  • We use it for an email connector to a function app and as a way to move items into a storage account.
  • We use it as a way to preprocess information before it goes into function app or a SharePoint site.
Read full review
  • Customer Support -- They have a knowledgeable team and are very responsive.
  • Communication -- Most questions are addressed quickly
  • Documentation -- The API documentation is well organized and easy to follow.
Read full review
Cons
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
  • There weren't really many cons to our experience. The only slight downside was the cost but they worked with us on that to make it work.
Read full review
Usability
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company Microsoft and we had nothing to worry about our data security. Also, Logic apps offered a great deal when it came to pricing and it was also so much easier to negotiate the plans and prices with the customer care representatives at Azure Logic Apps!
Read full review
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form.

Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a more robust path to unifying the behavior of connected systems.

Zapier is a workflow automation tool that I feel draws erroneous comparison to Cloud Elements that I need to highlight. Workflow automation tools (Zapier, IFTTT, Microsoft Flow) do provide multiple integrations, but for simplistic scenarios where only a handful of explicitly described steps need accomplished. Cloud Elements is a platform for developers to deliver faster and with higher reliability than making integrations one-by-one in complex systems that solve demanding problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
  • We are able to build integrations in HALF the time we could build them from scratch.
  • They allow our development team to spend more hours focused on developing our core product, not connections to other products.
  • Their large catalog of services to connect to allows us to spend much less time researching other platform integration endpoints and increases our R&D speed a considerable amount.
Read full review
ScreenShots