Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. IBM Cloud Managed Istio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service provides the Managed Istio installation add on, designed to provide additonal control over clusters and the microservices they comprise via automatic updates and lifecycle management of control plane components, and integration with platform logging and monitoring tools.N/A
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Features
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
5.6
Ratings
32% below category average
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
[Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)] is great when you need to be able to deploy a large number of services in a highly repeatable way. Once you know how to use it, it is a very fast to stand up a new environment. However there is a lot you need to know to get to that point and it is a specialized area. This is not suitable for small teams who are supporting multiple product stacks.
Read full review
It is a perfect application when you have multiple users and/or developers and you want to create rules and standards for access and the ability to change access levels. The reporting of usage is good, but adding more granularity into the metrics that have been used to measure are not specific enough. They provide detail but drilling into the detail would be more appropriate i.e. access to the baseline data.
Read full review
Pros
  • To scale the microservices very easily.
  • Easy to set up in CI/CD pipeline.
  • It has a good pricing option as well in Azure. Basic works fine.
  • Accelerates containerized application development for the developers.
Read full review
  • Debug issues
  • Monitoring
  • allows many services form many different sources
Read full review
Cons
  • GUI on azure portal need to enhanced.
  • The feature set should be matching with Openshift which is also kubernetes based
  • Troubleshooting errors
Read full review
  • Still missing functionalities for a full usage as traffic director.
Read full review
Usability
Barring certain missing features such as operator management , open cluster management, it does gives lot of options to host containerized applications. The GUI may be improved and can give user more insights to the cluster rather than using command line tools. The integration with standard azure monitoring tools is a big plus to use Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
Training and usage support available
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Worked with very similar in-house-built Kubernetes/container management system. We are leveraging AKS as it's more robust and stable being in the technical space for quite some time. Also, it has got a vast number of management and security features which makes it more attractive. They even have a model where the cost can be reduced by up to 90% if the application can afford to handle a quick downtime once in a while.
Read full review
1) One-stop solution for all the complex network connectivity managed by [IBM Cloud Managed Istio]. 2) Nice dashboard to understand the flow. 3) Easy to troubleshoot the service if any one of the APIs is not responding. 4) We can integrate it with Azure Kubernetes service and other cloud provider Kubernetes services. 5) Monitoring the health of the pods can be easily configured and alerts can be triggered very accurately with this tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The ability to scale has reduced the need for headcount in IT
  • The authentication process has kept us compliant with regulatory bodies
  • The ability to replicate environments is great.
Read full review
  • Management burden is reduced resulting in positive ROI.
  • Application is being seamlessly instrumented with good impact on business.
Read full review
ScreenShots