Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. IBM Cloud Container Registry

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry enables users to store and distribute container images, and run them in the IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service and other runtime environments.N/A
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Considered Both Products
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Container Registry
Chose IBM Cloud Container Registry
When I need to work with private containers in a proof of concept I use IBM Cloud Container Registry.
Features
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
5.6
1 Ratings
32% below category average
IBM Cloud Container Registry
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
At one instance, there was a fire in our data center and the backup power had some issues because of which the whole DC went down. I believe with AKS and the replication it's easier to handle such a situation. Also, the scenario would have been pretty transparent to the end-users.
Read full review
IBM
When I need to do a proof of concept of a solution for a client and it must have high levels of privacy and at the same time performance, I use IBM Cloud Container Registry.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Scales quickly when the user base increases randomly
  • Downgrades very fast if a bunch of users hop off the system
  • Great dev UX for IT
Read full review
IBM
  • Scalable Plans
  • Easily integrate it with IBM Kube service
  • Easy integration with IBM Cloud CI/CD tools.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expected charges are unclear until you see real production usage
  • Operations teams need to learn an entirely new skill set
Read full review
IBM
  • Kubernetes
  • CI/CD
  • Docker
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Barring certain missing features such as operator management , open cluster management, it does gives lot of options to host containerized applications. The GUI may be improved and can give user more insights to the cluster rather than using command line tools. The integration with standard azure monitoring tools is a big plus to use Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Due to cost efficiency. And using AZURE cloud for other services as well. Azure Kubernetes Service is more suitable to configure CI/CD pipelines. With a facility of automated or One click deployment and integration of the application. As compared with other Kubernetes Services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service and Google Kubernetes Service, Azure Kubernetes is most cost-efficient with the same facilities and with an advantage to configure easily, manage easily, as it is one click manageable with Microsoft applications. It provides high Microsoft security to containers and secures applications from any kind of harm.
Read full review
IBM
Not Applicable in our case. We started using IBM container registry as IBM bluemix is our preferred cloud platform
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Positive impact in moving applications to cloud from the in-hose data center to save cost
  • Sometimes got affected with some bugs on the AKS infrastructure but hasn't caused a big kios as our production footprint in AKS is not yet high
Read full review
IBM
  • reliability
  • easy integration
  • multicloud
Read full review
ScreenShots