Azure Internet Analyzer vs. QAComplete

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Internet Analyzer
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Internet Analyzer, from Microsoft's Azure suite of products, apps, and services, is a tool used to test how networking infrastructure changes will impact customers' performance. Users can test and measure how changes to a cloud network architecture affects users’ performance over the Internet. Whether migrating from on-premises to Azure or evaluating a new Azure service, Internet Analyzer helps learn from users’ data and Microsoft’s rich analytics to better understand and optimize a…N/A
QAComplete
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
QAComplete is a performance testing tool from SmartBear. The vendor says QAComplete was built from the ground-up to be an easy-to-use test case management tool, adapting to the user's existing processes and empowering users to manage all of their manual and automated tests with ease, while reporting on all test results in one central location. The vendor's goal is for QAComplete to allows users to spend less time managing tests and focus on what they do best; making great…N/A
Pricing
Azure Internet AnalyzerQAComplete
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Internet AnalyzerQAComplete
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Internet AnalyzerQAComplete
User Ratings
Azure Internet AnalyzerQAComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Internet AnalyzerQAComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Very well suited to requirements management, test suite creation and defect management. Not suited to project/task management.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Allows us to create individual tests then group them into comprehensive test plans.
  • Allows me to specify custom fields that match our product features to categorize both tests and defects.
  • Allows me to create a series of requirements then match tests against them for validation.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • The user interface can be somewhat perplexing and difficult to navigate at times.
  • Naming conventions aren't always succinct and additional training is needed by those who have more experience using the program.
  • A modern refresh of the UI would help keep the product from looking dated.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I gave QAComplete this rating because though I do feel that it is a powerful tool, it's definitely not designed for the everyday user. Obviously the target demographic is QA specialists who should be team members that are very technical and methodical in their approaches. However, for the rest of the team, it can often time prove difficult to navigate. Also, the UI is in need of a serious refresh.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have not had to work with their customer service directly yet. Our client has been utilizing this tool for years, so I would assume that the support they have received would be good enough to keep them wanting to continue to use the product.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We had used FogBugz and Freshdesk for quite some time. I hadn't been exposed to QAComplete until recently during a project with one of our clients, but we are already starting to see the superior benefits of this product. Once you wrap your head around the interface and navigate to the bug reports, it becomes a very powerful tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • From our side, it's been very easy to pick up on bugs reported by our clients. It's a great ROI for the cost as they are fairly minimal in comparison to other QA software.
  • I think a negative impact can be the administration of QA items. It definitely feels a bit bogged down.
  • My last negative would be that I don't believe it syncs in any way with the Atlassian software suite. I could be wrong on this but manual entry from system to system can be daunting at times.
Read full review
ScreenShots