Azure Firewall Manager vs. Titania Nipper

WAF is great for apps hosted within Azure. It allows for great security as well as funneling traffic out through Azure rather than having to bring it back on-prem to your internal firewall to then go back out. Can really give too much of a reason for a situation where it doesn’t work as it has been used in one particular situation.

Incentivized

When critical networking gear, such as a main firewall needs to be quickly audited.

Incentivized

• Anti -Spam and protection against phishing.
• Endpoint Security.
• DDOS Protection.

Incentivized

• Easy to use tool, with a low impact in network traffic.
• Support from the vendor (for any enquiries or problems).
• Quick in creating the reports that we need.
• Licensing costs are low in comparison to other solution/vendors.

Incentivized

• Functionality
• Setup is difficult.
• Networking

Incentivized

• We definitely need support for a wider range of smaller vendors of equipment
• Better summary of conflicting access control lists would help

Incentivized

We Selected Azure Firewall Manager because of its reliable service and Security, which they provide across our network architecture.

Incentivized

Although Nipper from Titania helps in auditing accurately every device in the network and helps in prioritizing the fixies, it is really useful for the part of the firewall in a network and also for the quick making of reports which are also customizable. But from our experience, the Qualys solution for scanning the networks, although is more costly, it also has more features and options in regards to assessing a network and the elements connected to the network, though it is also somehow less powerful when it comes to creating quick reports. Qualys has a more interface and dashboard approach regarding the results of the scans.

Incentivized

• Reduced time required to manage multiple products
• Increased network visability
• Good logs for audits

Incentivized

• Positive Return on Investment