Azure DevOps Server vs. SpiraTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
AzureDevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is a test management and application lifecycle management tool, from Microsoft's Visual Studio offerings. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
SpiraTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
SpiraTest allows customers to manage their software testing and quality assurance activities. It provides requirements management, test management and bug-tracking functionality with integrated reporting.
$43.66
per month per concurrent user
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud
$43.66
per month per concurrent user
Download
$423.66
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing on Cloud solution. 3 concurrent user minimum. Volume concurrent user discount available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Features
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
SpiraTest
7.8
Ratings
3% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServerSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
In our case it was best suited when we started working remotely, we were able to track everything in out projects easily, able to share our codes, give reviews for the codes and also create integration and deployment CI/CD plans for the release and testing. It helped our team members with the productivity, early prototyping and release. Create summarised reports of different aspect of our projects. Even in other scenarios it is one of the best tools to use for collaboration and project management. I haven't found any specific scenario where it is not appropriate
Read full review
I think SpiraTest is well suited as a test suite, but in situations where the team is already using multiple products from one particular provider, it may be better to go with that provider's test solution. This is because integrations are very important nowadays, and should be considered when picking your project management software. It should be noted that management selected SpiraTest primarily due to the low cost of the test software. I'm less familiar with other test software in the field, but if cost is an issue, you should take a look at SpiraTest.
Read full review
Pros
  • Vast range of Template for Automated Build and Release Pipeline with option to have conditional triggers
  • Code repository mechanism is aligned with GIT which is a well known public repository system
  • Bug Management is also an integral feature of this tool
  • Dashboard creation option of Build and Release pipeline is also available
Read full review
  • It is easy to manage requirements.
  • Users and roles are easily managed.
  • Cloning is really helpful to stack all the similar test cases.
Read full review
Cons
  • Searching through code can be somewhat cumbersome. It would be nice if there was a way to do general searches in certain areas of the system.
  • Without proper training, the system can be confusing to navigate. This issue can be prevented with good training but it is something to be aware of.
  • Navigation can be clunky at times depending on where you are in the system. For power users, this is not a huge deal but it is a tad bit annoying.
Read full review
  • Training can be difficult to find at times.
  • Basic reporting can become very verbose unless you set lots of filters and parameters.
  • The ability to customize some of the verbiage in the application would help bridge the gap between translating what SpiraTest's testing terminology is and the company culture uses for testing terminology.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
As promised during product selection, SpiraPlan support has always been quick and helpful. Replies almost always come back in hours (and often in an hour or two). And SpiraPlan's online tech support maintains all support conversations online so no need to look through emails to try to recall repllies.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Azure DevOps is a fully integrated solution that solves all of the problems that our separate tools did in a much easier-to-use way. Before we implemented DevOps we had three different solutions that we had to integrate with each other and required a lot of manual intervention to make sure they worked correctly.
Read full review
I migrated out of another test management tool mid project to Spira. The Spira import tools made this relatively easy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
  • Most of SpiraPlan is easy and intuitive to use so employees have been quickly productive
  • Artifact linking saves tracking time and is very easy for anyone to do
  • custom test creation will still take a LOT of time
Read full review
ScreenShots

SpiraTest Screenshots

Screenshot of real-time dashboards.Screenshot of an example of the customizable reporting.Screenshot of requirements management.Screenshot of test management.