Azure DevOps Server vs. Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure DevOps Server | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | AzureDevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is a test management and application lifecycle management tool, from Microsoft's Visual Studio offerings. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | Score10 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile. | $500 per month per user |
| Azure DevOps Server | Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | We also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more! | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure DevOps Server | Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score9.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure DevOps Services Score7.7 out of 10 | PTC Windchill RV&S Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Azure DevOps Services Score7.7 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score9.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure DevOps Server | Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Azure DevOps Server | Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |



