TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Data Lake Storage

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AAzure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is a highly scalable and cost-effective data lake solution for big data analytics. It combines the power of a high-performance file system with massive scale and economy to help you speed your time to insight. Data Lake Storage Gen2 extends Azure Blob Storage capabilities and is optimized for analytics workloads.N/A

    Db2 Big SQL

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM offers Db2 Big SQL, an enterprise grade hybrid ANSI-compliant SQL on Hadoop engine, delivering massively parallel processing (MPP) and advanced data query. Big SQL offers a single database connection or query for disparate sources such as HDFS, RDMS, NoSQL databases, object stores and WebHDFS.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    92%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Small Businesses
    Azure Blob Storage
    Score9.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Pure Storage FlashBlade
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Cloudera Manager
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud Storage
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Apache Spark
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (13 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Data Lake StorageDb2 Big SQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Data Lake is an absolutely essential piece of a modern data and analytics platform. Over the past 2 years, our usage of Azure Data Lake as a reporting source has continued to grow and far exceeds more traditional sources like MS SQL, Oracle, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    My recommendation obviously would depend on the application. But I think given the right requirements, IBM DB2 Big SQL is definitely a contender for a database platform. Especially when disparate data and multiple data stores are involved. I like the fact I can use the product to federate my data and make it look like it's all in one place. The engine is high performance and if you desire to use Hadoop, this could be your platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Setting up Azure Data Lake Storage account, container is quite easy
    • Access from anywhere and easy maintenance
    • Integration with Azure Data Factory service for end to end pipeline is pretty easy
    • Can store Any form of data (Structured, Unstructured, Semi) in faster manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • data storage
    • data manipulation
    • data definitions
    • data reliability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • study for the certifications also to have them as a reference for work when you have any questions about applying a configuration to the equipment.
    • The Internet interface is simple and easy to use. Capacity is good and it's good that HP continues to innovate with this technology
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Cloud readiness.
    • Ease of implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM DB2 is a solid service but hasn't seen much innovation over the past decade. It gets the job done and supports our IT operations across digital so it is fair.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM did a good job of supporting us during our evaluation and proof of concept. They were able to provide all necessary guidance, answer questions, help us architect it, etc. We were pleased with the support provided by the vendor. I will caveat and say this support was all before the sale, however, we have a ton of IBM products and they provide the same high level of support for all of them. I didn't see this being any different. I give IBM support two thumbs up!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Azure Data Lake Storage from a functionality perspective is a much easier solution to work with. It's implementation from Amazon EMR went smooth, and continued usage is definitely better. However, Amazon EMR was significantly cheaper overall between the high transaction fees and cost of storage due to growth. The two both have their advantages and disadvantages, but the functionality of Azure Data Lake Storage outweighed it's cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    MS SQL Server was ruled out given we didn't feel we could collapse environments. We thought of MS-SQL as more of a one for one replacement for Sybase ASE, i.e., server for server. SAP HANA was evaluated and given a big thumbs up but was rejected because the SQL would have to be rewritten at the time (now they have an accelerator so you don't have to). Also, there was a very low adoption rate within the enterprise. IBM DB2 Big SQL was not selected even though technically it achieved high scores, because we could not find readily available talent and low adoption rate within the enterprise (basically no adoption at the time). We ended up selecting Exadata because of the high adoption rate within the enterprise even though technically HANA and Big SQL were superior in our evaluations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Instead of having separate pools of storage for data we are now operating on a single layer platform which has cut down on time spent on maintaining those separate pools.
    • We have had more of an ROI with the scalability as we are able to control costs of storage when need be.
    • We are able to operate in a more streamlined approach as we are able to stay within the Azure suite of products and integrate seamlessly with the rest of the applications in our cloud-based infrastructure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • better data visibility
    • solid reliability for mission critical data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots