TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Data Factory vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Data Factory

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Data Factory is a service built for all data integration needs and skill levels. It is designed to allow the user to easily construct ETL and ELT processes code-free within the intuitive visual environment, or write one's own code. Visually integrate data sources using more than 80 natively built and maintenance-free connectors at no added cost. Focus on data—the serverless integration service does the rest.N/A

    IBM InfoSphere Information Server

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Data Factory
    The easy integration with other Microsoft software as well as high processing speed, very flexible cost, and high level of security of Microsoft Azure products and services stack up against other similar products.
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Data Source Connection
    Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Azure Data Factory and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Feature
    Azure Data Factory
    9.0
    7 Ratings
    7% above category average
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    10.0
    5 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Connect to traditional data sources9.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL9.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Data Transformations
    Comparison of Data Transformations features of Azure Data Factory and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Feature
    Azure Data Factory
    8.5
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    10.0
    5 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Simple transformations9.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Complex transformations8.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Data Modeling
    Comparison of Data Modeling features of Azure Data Factory and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Feature
    Azure Data Factory
    7.2
    7 Ratings
    10% below category average
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    9.7
    5 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Data model creation8.05 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Metadata management7.06 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Business rules and workflow7.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Collaboration6.06 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Testing and debugging7.07 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Data Governance
    Comparison of Data Governance features of Azure Data Factory and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Feature
    Azure Data Factory
    7.5
    7 Ratings
    8% below category average
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    9.5
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Integration with data quality tools7.07 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Integration with MDM tools8.07 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Small Businesses
    Skyvia
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Skyvia
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Score8 out of 10
    Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.2 out of 10
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Well-suited Scenarios for Azure Data Factory (ADF): When an organization has data sources spread across on-premises databases and cloud storage solutions, I think Azure Data Factory is excellent for integrating these sources. Azure Data Factory's integration with Azure Databricks allows it to handle large-scale data transformations effectively, leveraging the power of distributed processing. For regular ETL or ELT processes that need to run at specific intervals (daily, weekly, etc.), I think Azure Data Factory's scheduling capabilities are very handy. Less Appropriate Scenarios for Azure Data Factory: Real-time Data Streaming - Azure Data Factory is primarily batch-oriented. Simple Data Copy Tasks - For straightforward data copy tasks without the need for transformation or complex workflows, in my opinion, using Azure Data Factory might be overkill; simpler tools or scripts could suffice. Advanced Data Science Workflows: While Azure Data Factory can handle data prep and transformation, in my experience, it's not designed for in-depth data science tasks. I think for advanced analytics, machine learning, or statistical modeling, integration with specialized tools would be necessary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • It allows copying data from various types of data sources like on-premise files, Azure Database, Excel, JSON, Azure Synapse, API, etc. to the desired destination.
    • We can use linked service in multiple pipeline/data load.
    • It also allows the running of SSIS & SSMS packages which makes it an easy-to-use ETL & ELT tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
    • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
    • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Limited source/sink (target) connectors depending on which area of Azure Data Factory you are using.
    • Does not yet have parity with SSIS as far as the transforms available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
    • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
    • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Scale of implementation
    • IBM techsupport
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    So far product has performed as expected. We were noticing some performance issues, but they were largely Synapse related. This has led to a shift from Synapse to Databricks. Overall this has delayed our analytic platform. Once databricks becomes fully operational, Azure Data Factory will be critical to our environment and future success.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    We have not had need to engage with Microsoft much on Azure Data Factory, but they have been responsive and helpful when needed. This being said, we have not had a major emergency or outage requiring their intervention. The score of seven is a representation that they have done well for now, but have not proved out their support for a significant issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    The easy integration with other Microsoft software as well as high processing speed, very flexible cost, and high level of security of Microsoft Azure products and services stack up against other similar products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • It is very useful and make things easier
    • Debugging can improve
    • Its better suited than other products with the same objective
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
    • Better documentation and governance.
    • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots