TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Container Instances vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Azure Container Instances

18 Reviews and Ratings

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

5 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Container Instances

    Score5.9 out of 10
    		N/AMicrosoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud.

    $0.01

    Per GB Per Hour

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

    Score9.8 out of 10
    		N/ARed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Editions & Modules
    Memory
    $0.00533
    Per GB Per Hour
    vCPU
    $0.04860
    Per vCPU
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Azure Container Instances and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Feature
    Azure Container Instances
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Container InstancesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
    Asad Khan
    Systems Solution Architect
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
    • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
    • Built-in Security & compliance.
    Asad Khan
    Systems Solution Architect
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
    • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
    • LCM of ACM itself.
    Asad Khan
    Systems Solution Architect
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
    Asad Khan
    Systems Solution Architect
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
    • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
    • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
    Asad Khan
    Systems Solution Architect
    Read full review
    ScreenShots